will be permitted to play out without interference by the public and specifically by those being targeted by the investigation. mueller documents ten episodes of possible obstruction by the president. in some he suggest there was not a clear case of obstruction, but in other key examples, mueller finds, quote, substantial evidence. article 2 of the constitution gives the president broad powers to run the executive branch. it doesn t give him authority to act corruptly and doesn t give authority to obstruct justice. the report presents a a series of encounters and events relegal vooeling a president angered by an investigation he could not contain. you see him reacting to challenges in front of him in trying to gain control of the situation. trump lost control through a key event. the recusal of his attorney general. i am now decided to recuse myself. jeff sessions recusal handed
setback for the trump administration in this ongoing legal drama over the president s travel ban. this time, a majority of judges on the fourth circuit court of appeals upholding a lower court s decision to indefinitely halt the ban, finding that it likely violates the constitution because its primary purpose was the disfavor muslims. the court s ruling on this was lengthy and scathing in part that the congress granted the president broad powers but when it comes to immigration the president s power can t go unchecked. the trump administration had tried to justify their attempt to ban foreign nationals from six muslim-majority countries on national security grounds but at the ends of the day, trump s words doomed any legal justification his lawyers could have offered in this case with the majority of the judges finding that then candidate
reporter: another significant setback for the trump administration in this ongoing legal drama over the president s travel ban. this time, a majority of judges on the fourth circuit court of appeals upholding a lower court s decision to indefinitely halt the ban, finding that it likely violates the constitution because its primary purpose was to disfavor muslims. the court s ruling on this was lengthy and scathing, explaining in part that congress granted the president broad powers, but when it comes to immigration, the president s power can t go unchecked. the trump administration had tried to justify their attempt to ban foreign nationals from six muslim majority countries on national security grounds, but at the end of the day, trump s own words doomed any legal justification his lawyers could have offered in this case with the majority of the judges finding that then candidate trump s campaign statements reveal that on numerous
once again, calling it intolerant and indiscriminatory. exactly when the white house will take its case to the high court is unclear. cnn s laura jarrett has more from washington. reporter: another significant setback for the trump administration in this ongoing legal drama over the president s travel ban. this time, a majority of judges on the fourth circuit court of appeals upholding a lower court s decision to indefinitely halt the ban, finding that it likely violates the constitution because its primary purpose was to disfavor muslims. the court s ruling on this was lengthy and scathing, explaining in part that congress granted the president broad powers, but when it comes to immigration, the president s power can t go unchecked. the trump administration had tried to justify their attempt to ban foreign nationals from six muslim-majority countries on national security grounds, but at the end of the day, trump s own words doomed any legal
countries. the president citing the campaign rhetoric, calling it intolerant and discriminatory. when they will take their case to the high court remains unclear. another significant setback for the trump administration in this ongoing legal drama over the president s travel ban. this time, a majority of judges on the fourth circuit court of appeals upholding a lower court s decision to indefinitely halt the ban finding that it likely violates the constitution because its primary purpose was to disfavor muslims. the court s ruling on this was long and scathing, complaining in part that congress granted the president broad powers but when it comes to immigration the president s power can t go unchecked. the trump administration had tried to justify their attempt to ban foreign nationals from six muslim majority countries on national security grounds. but at the end of the day