Page 3 - Brown Vs News Today

Least one person and hurting more than a dozen others. What authorities are saying tonight about the possible motive. The suspect was backing the vehicle up with the intent of going into it again. Norah the Cbs Evening News starts now. Good evening. Im norah odonnell, and thank you for being with us. We want to begin tonight with a deadly and terrifying day in texas. Police say a stolen Big Rig Semitruck was intentionally crashed into a Government Office building, killing one person and injuring...

Up to 25 years in the slammer, and prosecutors hint there could be more charges on the way. Its a real head scratcher if you take joes word that his son has done nothing wrong. First of all, my sons done nothing wrong. I trust him, i have faith in him, and impacts my presidency by making me feel proud about him. This thing about a gun, i didnt know anything about it. I love my son, hes on the straight and narrow and has been for a couple years now, and im so proud of him. Greg democrats are reli...

Him manipulate and the legal wrangling that he has to go through in this document to actually criminalize thought, criminalize legal advice. criminalize a legal position and a strategy whether they are right or wrong that they had believing that this election was rigged. and so you dont see any reference to mens rea, their criminal intent, because they cant put it in the document. they cant find criminal intent in donald trump or any of these four lawyers, political consultant, and a civil lawye...

And their ex-roommate, 24-year-old erin fitzgerald, for stealing their dog and filing a false cps claim. >> byrd: order! all rise! this is case number 113 on the calendar in the matter of brown vs. fitzgerald-scharet. >> judge judy: thank you. >> byrd: youre welcome, judge. parties have been sworn in. you may be seated. ladies, have a seat, please. >> judge judy: mr. and mrs. brown, it is your claim that the defendants have your dog. >> yes. >> yes. >> judge judy: they say that the dog has been ...

♪ the early 1950s. the post-war boom. but for many the american dream was only available if you were white. segregation had an iron grip on the south. >> we have absolutely no intention of integrating in the south. >> for the brown family of topeka, kansas separate but equal meant their daughter could not attend her neighborhood school. the supreme court heard the case of brown vs. the board of education. like america itself the court was bitterly divided over separate but equal. >> separate e...

Im norah odonnell here in our nations capitol. good nigh >> we walked up to the car. and we said, "can we get our ball back?" >> judge judy: and what did she say to you? >> she said, "no." >> announcer: taking a childs basketball wasnt a slam dunk. >> judge judy: you actually stole his property. >> no, maam. >> judge judy: no, im telling you. thats not a question. >> no. it is -- >> judge judy: thats not a question. >> announcer: but did this young boy commit a foul? >> he came up, and he kicked...

Ivf, birth control, contraception, same sex marriage, and things people dont want to talk about. brown vs. board of education, et cetera. >> dissents are written to disagree with the majority opinion. but theyre also written for history. and theyre written for future courts that might take those issues up and might pull the court in that direction. so, i think clarence thomas was aiming for the fences there with the hope that he might get a future even more aggressive supreme court. >> since rep...

To expand peoples rights over time. and this is a direction that is entirely the opposite from the point of view of women especially people generally. >> what im struck by is the method of reasoning and the dissents point this out. when you look at a ruling like plessy vs. furgs which allowed for segregation, when brown vs. board of education overturned that and said we made a mistake, what it cited was decades of social science evidence that showed that the contention in plessy versus ferguson ...

>> not often at all. i cannot think of a precedent for rolling back an individual right that especially women have depended on for five decades. the court changes its mind on occasion. but not in this direction. we usually see the court trying to expand peoples rights over time. and this is a direction that is entirely the opposite from the point of view of women especially people generally. >> what im struck by is the method of reasoning and the dissents point this out. when you look at a rulin...

Vs. ferguson, brown vs. board of education, weigh in on that argument. >> if youre going to overturn a precedent, its supposed to be one of the fundamental foundational things that the supreme court is based on. thats what justice roberts says in his concurring opinion. he didnt want to go as far as to overturn roe versus wade because judicial restraint dictated they did not do that. but they did anyway. the difference between what happened today and what happened in brown v. board of education ...