Sometimes the inspectors were out there several times in one year, nso what can be done to make sure that this wont happen in the future . Im making sure that we get every permit required for all dispensaries. In the past, i wasnt part of the program, but from my understanding and the path a referral went to the department until land use was approved, then, the referral came back and it was marked approved or disapproved, but there wasnt specific conditions stated explicitly on that referral. Whereas with our referral now, when when we sent those referrals over, there was an explanation as to why they denied them and what they would have to do. Okay. But that thats all i can say. What i also want to say that i personally spoke to Larry Kessler, and Larry Kessler does not remember any phone call with anyone from bloom room authorizing him. At the directors hearing no, and i appreciate that. I dont think that is as concerning to me as the fact and i agree with you as far as and then, the
Form 1 through 8 item and submits items the 70,000 permits, d. B. I. Is the owner and takes that responsibility. There is an owner in that case. Whether or not public works owns 20k. They will be together in the space in the new world. I feel like that makes sense to me they will be together, which is an improvement. Right now they are in different be locations. How much more coordination is needed . That feels like a lot. Once it is all an electronic plan review, departments will make comments in blue beam and comments with the customer in blue beam to reduce the issues of projects moving between the horizontal and vote vertical world if that helps. It does. I like the idea of there being a seamless Customer Experience. Sometimes for the sake of clarity one dominant agency which sounds like it would be d. B. I. Takes the primary role and delegates appropriately. It may facilitate that desirable improvement in Customer Experience, and certainty as to how do i do this . Who did i go to
Commissioner honda, commissioner santacana and commissioner tanner. He will provide the board with legal advice this evening. Im julie, the boards executive director. We will be joined by representatives from the City Department that has cases before the board. Scott sanchez from the Planning Department is sitting in front. He also representing the planning commission. We have joseph duffy representing the department of building inspection. We have leah from San Francisco public works and i believe debra will be present from San Francisco Public Works Bureau street use and mapping. The board requests that you turn off or silence your phones and other electronic devices. Please carry on conversations in the hallway. The rules of presentation as follows. Appellants permit holders and respondents are given seven minutes to present their case and three minutes for he re but thal. Rebuttal. Members not affiliated with the parties have three minutes to address the board and no rebuttal. They
The new we are seeing is just black buildings completely flat on the street level. And they have a rooftop where you can have a deck or this is their new recreation area. New folks that come into the neighborhood no longer get to experience the community as a whole. So these guidelines our beautiful, Historic Buildings from turning into a moratorium of black. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hello. I am a life resident of the mission. Lived all my life off the corridor of 24th street. And weve seen many changes coming into calle 24. And i would like to ask that you support this new design that we are trying to put in place for the regulations. So thats all i have to say. Thank you very much for your time. Thank you very much. Any other Public Comment on this item . Okay. Public comment is now closed. So i totally support these guidelines. I know folks have been working for many, many years to get there. Thank you to calle 24 and eric specifically and the planning staff for g
Settling is going to occur, it president swig, it will occur in the building. Doesnt the frackinger to impact of a renovation from next door only occur when there is construction and dealing with redoing the foundation or building a new foundation. President swig yes. I am kind of leaning towards myself just for comfort for the appellant is that the d. B. I. Do a site visit. And that latch moving down an inch and a half is quite substantial. Theres 10, 12 notices of violation on this. We have written up going out there again is no point. There order of abatement and notice of violation. I couldnt even print that many violations and i couldnt print them all. The question i have here is that the appellant has stated that there is damage to his property. The permit holder said that her building is not responsible and the work she is done is not responsible. I am trying to figure out if d. B. I. Can go out there and see if there was work done on that side. We have that notice of violation.