Neighborhoods or districts to say they dont want that use in their district or particular area i understand the state legislation says that no matter you describe the shelter as it has to be as of right and at least in one district but weve got 11 districts pick one and the other 10 can say theoretically so my question first to staff is moving backwards in the process were there other solutions to the compliance with the state law that was considered up to and including the permanent uses of hotels im not suggesting thats the right way by i just want to get at the fact and no one said it here i feel last week im obligated to say there are neighborhood weve seen it in transitional housing i want to acknowledge that calling out this particular use opens it up to neighborhood that is a we dont want that use in the neighborhood. Commissioner first of all, its not a Industrial District its a Zoning District. Zoning. Its no a supervisorial district the important fact we currently because of
Courage people to counseling communicate with the shelter first many problems are solved that way a longstanding sort of urban belief about shelter not being safe we may be address older stories we try to look at those we have a system that attempts to respond to my concerns of the people urging our shelter system when we do our up to this point in time count which well be doing again in january of 2015 looking people of their couch suffering in a park or in a shelter or incarcerated weve lost shelter beds because the providers of shelters said they no longer want to be sherltsd and its hard for us to find replacements you have to find knows that meet codes this legislation helps to address the fact beven said that well, the entire Community Needs to be responding to San Francisco its a city and county of San Francisco issue and National Issue is but our system does attempt to respond to the concerns of people as they come up we also over homeless storage to people that are looking to
Marsh theatre you can see the wall of the mark theatre and see the window in the upper level from valencia street from the path. The new proposed building will block that site and provide an acoustical noise barrier. Did you review the pal letty report . Yes i did. It came on after that. I have only been involved in the past month or so. And i found the pal letty report to be objective and pointed out some of the inherent weaknesses in the mark theatre and some suggestions as to what could be done to improve it. Thank you. Okay. Well i would like to follow that up and what has done to protect this project from the marsh theatre. So in the past, prior to the latest ceqa appeal, the sponsor did higher and acoustic cult consultant and they also took other efforts. They eliminated the roof depth feature out of response of noise. They limited construction hours and you may have seen in the approval to address the theatres schedule and incorporated in the design to design between the adjacen
Suggestions as to what could be done to improve it. Thank you. Okay. Well i would like to follow that up and what has done to protect this project from the marsh theatre. So in the past, prior to the latest ceqa appeal, the sponsor did higher and acoustic cult consultant and they also took other efforts. They eliminated the roof depth feature out of response of noise. They limited construction hours and you may have seen in the approval to address the theatres schedule and incorporated in the design to design between the adjacent buildings. Im happy to go what some of those are as well as well as the items raised by the marsh earlier. The project sponsor has agreed to the items shown on the lefthand column. Thank you very much. What about the right hand column . The right hand columns have been propose fwied marsh but not agreed to buy the by the parties. So rejected . Yes. Can you address the mandated Community Liaison and when did that come on . Mark, the project sponsor is acting as
In the mark theatre and some suggestions as to what could be done to improve it. Thank you. Okay. Well i would like to follow that up and what has done to protect this project from the marsh theatre. So in the past, prior to the latest ceqa appeal, the sponsor did higher and acoustic cult consultant and they also took other efforts. They eliminated the roof depth feature out of response of noise. They limited construction hours and you may have seen in the approval to address the theatres schedule and incorporated in the design to design between the adjacent buildings. Im happy to go what some of those are as well as well as the items raised by the marsh earlier. The project sponsor has agreed to the items shown on the lefthand column. Thank you very much. What about the right hand column . The right hand columns have been propose fwied marsh but not agreed to buy the by the parties. So rejected . Yes. Can you address the mandated Community Liaison and when did that come on . Mark, the