the right direction, what your feelings on all this? the right direction, what your feelings on all this? well, he is not the first feelings on all this? well, he is not the first scientist feelings on all this? well, he is not the first scientist to - feelings on all this? well, he is not the first scientist to have i not the first scientist to have doubts about the work they are doing. we need to stop the scaremongering. the letters are important, to raise awareness, i guess, but the key thing is that the threat of a completely existential threat of a completely existential threat with al is a long way off. we need to prepare for that, we need to be aware, as we have known all along it would be possible. if you are building machines that are more intelligent than ourselves, and they could, eventually, become a threat to us. so we have to need to present that. y ., ., that. are you dealing with some artificial intelligence that. are you dealing with some artificial intelligen
the surface. that s what gives the oceans life. the oceans give us breath and so thinking about how we tackle this trillion ton monster of excess carbon. we call carbon godzilla in the our people are coming at it from different ways. some are building machines. some want to use artificial whale poop, which is really volcanic ash, something we ve gone too far. we ve waited too long, and we need to spray sunscreen in the sky to turn down the sun for a couple of years and biased time, so we get into all these big radical ideas. petroleum, you know that. this is wales. that s right. fuel. that s it. we used to burn whales for light exactly . and a certain point, we thought maybe we should find something else. and then there s kerosene. and then there s gasoline. and now we re at that same moment, but the fossil fuel interests of awful powerful of these solutions really make up for anything if we don t radically change our behavior. no, that s it. none of these solutions matter, and i think
government transfer of power and peace like that. what do we know about sort of the context in that? absolutely and so you know, they ve we know the witnesses have gone in cuccinelli and chad wolf have gone and talked about how they told trump and rudy giuliani. danny who was obviously trump s lawyer at the time that dhs couldn t see his building machines. but then robert o brien, who was trump s national security adviser at the time, has gone in and talk to prosecutors about a meeting that took place days after future. nellie and wolf warned trump where the idea of seizing voting machines came up again, and trump didn t shoot it down. so they re reading a little bit of a sense of what prosecutors are asking. that s a big deal, general. let s get some legal context. if donald trump is in the room, and he told you do not have the authority to do this, and he insists on doing it anyway. everything in a criminal case comes down to intent, and when you were advised of something that you re
million chinese away from the jobs they are doing. but what will be the jobs they are re educated for? exactly per trip i think we have much exactly per trip i think we have much bigger problems than as an implant much bigger problems than as an implant once we start building machines that are smarter than us, which machines that are smarter than us, which is machines that are smarter than us, which is what we are doing. building something which is what we are doing. building something smarter than us which we don t something smarter than us which we don t quite something smarter than us which we don t quite understand, it s a dangerous situation. are don t quite understand, it s a dangerous situation.- don t quite understand, it s a dangerous situation. are you saying it is an extension dangerous situation. are you saying it is an extension for dangerous situation. are you saying it is an extension for it? dangerous situation. are you saying it is an extension for it