we ll see how she does. you ll be covering politics for us. thanks very much. this programming note, cnn will air a town hall in des moines, iowa next monday night. jake tapper will moderate right here. giuliani changes his story multiple times about donald trump s involvement in a building project. are any of his versions credible right now? she changes her story after knowledge of the she is apologizing to a rush thsian bi na nar. stay with us. you re in the situation room. res across the country bring financial stress to work. if you re stressed out financially at home, you re going to be too worried to be able to do a good job. i want to be able to offer all of the benefits
you are correct instructing michael cohen to lie if that happened, which now looks like it obviously didn t, is a crime. why we instruct him to lie about a noncrime, a building project in moscow, tucker, is not illegal. there is nothing illegal about it part of the story made no sense. secondly, think about, this tucker. you were in journalism before. you know, you have the scoop of the century right here, right? and you give it to buzzfeed and to a reporter at buzzfeed with a checkered path? what does this say now think this through in the audience. this was probably some kind of a canary trap. it was probably someone feeding false information to sniff out some leakers on the inside of the government and the only people eager enough to pick up this ridiculous story was this discredited guy at buzzfeed with a history of militias action i malicious action in e journalism field. i could be wrong. it could just be a bad source. this says to me it was probably a canary trap. this guy got
you are correct instructing michael cohen to lie if that happened, which now looks like it obviously didn t, is a crime. why we instruct him to lie about a noncrime, a building project in moscow, tucker, is not illegal. there is nothing illegal about it part of the story made no sense. secondly, think about, this tucker. you were in journalism before. you know, you have the scoop of the century right here, right? and you give it to buzzfeed and to a reporter at buzzfeed with a checkered path? what does this say now think this through in the audience. this was probably some kind of a canary trap. it was probably someone feeding false information to sniff out some leakers on the inside of the government and the only people eager enough to pick up this ridiculous story was this discredited guy at buzzfeed with a history of militias action i malicious action in e journalism field. i could be wrong. it could just be a bad source. this says to me it was probably a canary trap. this guy got
group think. an amazing night of news. stay with fox sean hannity is next and most important of all have a great relaxing and happy weekend with those you love. sean: this is a fox news alert on this friday night big bombshell news. the buzzfeed so-called bombshell you have been hearing about all day it is a dud. it is a fraud. it is a lie it is all fake news. so the professional trump haters and the fake news media they have yet done it again. and earlier today buzzfeed news reported a salacious story about michael cohen and president trump alleging that cohen briefed trump about a building project in moscow numerous times and that the president directed michael cohen to lie about the existence of that project when it already had been well-known. the story allegedly sourced two anonymous federal law enforcement officials. as it turns out this report
initiate a crime. you were correct instructing michael cohen to lie if that happen is a crime. why would he instruct him to lie about a non crime. a building project in moscow, tucker is not illegal. it made no sense. tucker, you were in journalism before. you have the scoop of the century, you give it to buzzfeed and a reporter as buzzfeed with a checkered past? think this through in the audience. it was some kind of a canary trap.ro someone feeding false information to sniff out leakers on the inside of the government. the only people eager enough to pick this up was a discredited guy at buzzfeed with a history of malicious actions. i could be wrong. i see this as a canary trap this.