Essentially the Conservative Party want to conserve the system and they are saying that the system is good, it works and lets stick with it. And millions of americans do not buy into any and millions of americans do not buy into any of and millions of americans do not buy into any of these Conspiracy Theories into any of these Conspiracy Theories and they are very happy to vote for theories and they are very happy to vote for Donald Trump. Because they Ust Vote for Donald Trump. Because they just believe vote for Donald Trump. Because they just believe that he is in the lead and more just believe that he is in the lead and more credible on the economy. And the and more credible on the economy. And the frustration of stephanie was interesting reflecting the frustration in the Republican Party to focus frustration in the Republican Party to focus on the issues are not on the heritage of Kamala Harris because the heritage of Kamala Harris because the top issues are immigration in the Econ
Public services that we all pay for and its only fair that he and his billionaire friends chip in to make sure everyone else has a chance to succeed. The fact they reacted so strongly, so angrily to being asked to chip in mark tells you all you need to know. The system is working great for the wealthy and wellconnected and jamie dimond does not want that to change but i will fight to make sure it works for everyone. Heres a question. Will liz warren class warfare rhetoric help her pay off at the polls. Steve, what do you think . Only in the left wing of the democratic party, the left bar left activists will move up in the polls but most americans realize what Abraham Lincoln said you dont help the poor by tearing down the socalled rich. Jamie dimond had the same interceptor as everyone else but created an extraordinary institution that did not need a bailout in 2008 and was forced to do so by the federal government. Others like jeff bezos created Great Companies and what does liz warre
D. C. Today the Biden Campaign lo launches the difference between communities and communities of colors. The first criminal trial of an expresident comes to a head this week. A former advisor is here. Overnight, to senators are calling for Justice Samuel alito to recuse himself from election cases. Grab your coffee and settle in. Welcome to the weekend. New this morning, federal prosecutors are asking for help as donald trump increases his attacks on the justice system. The special Councils Office is now asking the judge in the classified documents case to block trump for Making Statements that could endanger Law Enforcement investigating and prosecuting him in that case. The request comes after trump falsely claimed the Biden Administration authorized the fbi to use deadly force against him during the 2022 maralago rate. Of course, that is not true. The Justice Department of course followed the standard policy. Just one escalation this week of trumps Outrageous Campaign rhetoric. Anot
Admitting that these facts were so inextricably intertwined in a colloquy with justice barrett, that it would be very difficult to separate them out on remand. Thats how i interpreted his statements. Please to translate that for people watching, that means that basically, if it wasnt official act, they would not be able to use that potentially at trial. He was arguing they should be able to use it to paint a bigger picture. But trump has argued, total immunity. He has not said, well, some of these are private x. This would mean the case could at least in part go forward and go to trial, we believe that without the official acts charged in the indictment, there is no case. Weve been very consistent in our position from the start, starting with the District Court proceeding through the circuit. Now at the us Supreme Court, that what were talking about is absolute immunity. Yes. But absolute immunity just for a president s official acts in office. I think thats a crucial distinction. And
Im period in question. I thought in many what we did a concession at all was Michael Dreeben essentially admitting the attorney for the special counsels office, essentially admitting that these facts were so inextricably intertwined in a colloquy with justice barrett, that it would be very difficult to separate them out on remand. Thats how i interpret for his statements at least. Well, and to translate that for people watching, that means that basically, if it wasnt official act, they would not be able to use that potentially at trial. He was arguing they should be able to use it to paint a bigger picture. But trump has argued, total immunity. He has not said, well, some of these are private x this would mean the case could at least in part go forward and go to trial. We believe that without the official acts charged in the indictment, there is no case. Weve been very consistent in our position from the start, starting with the District Court proceeding through the circuit. Now at the