End of privacy enforcement of broadband is a carrier under the Communications Act previously the ftc had successfully been forced privacy against broad band providers except for the Net Neutrality order there would still we doing that they have brought the number of Enforcement Actions the niner a result of privacy violations wondering what justifies the new proposal from the approach and in fact, there are widespread concerns these are in another step in the attempt to become the policeman and of the internet. They also have a number of problematic consequences they will impose unnecessary regulations with the internet ecosystem. Would we have the same internet today with this prescriptive rules if imposed a decade ago . Additionally it is likely they would only confuse consumers to give a false sense of security. There are serious legal questions are they consistent with the First Amendment . We have the chair person and minority members to provide their perspective i think them for
Data security, the way the virtual marketplace is used, and the way our constituents want to have a tool box to protect, as i call it, their virtual you online. So, we appreciate your time, your willingness to be with us this morning, and i yield back to the chair of the committee. Yield back. Gentleman from texas mr. Barton want to use some of that time . Thank you mr. Chairman. Ive served on this committee since 1986. Ive served with three of the four former chairman, mr. Wiley preceded me. Weve had some agreements, weve had some disagreements. So its good to have all four of you gentlemen here today. When i was chairman of the full committee, back in 1996, my commutety introduced a bill we call the coke bill, the communication opportunity promotion enhancement act of 2006. It dealt with national franchising, Net Neutrality, public educational and governmental access, e911 and what we now call void. It passed the house 321101, but it didnt come up for a vote in the senate. I voted fo
[inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] take your seats, and our friends in the audience would like to take a seat, we will get going with our hearing. Ill call to order subcommittee on Communications Director technology and thank our witnesses for being here. Subcom for this worst of what will be many hearings as we look to update the king occasions act. K few sectors of our economy ors. Equal to the communications and Technology Sec atorre when it ci to innovation, investment in the american economy, and jobinveste creation. In these tough Economic Times we as policymakers should begh ecoc committed to fostering this economy. Tering of the yet the loss the regular the industry are outdated at besthat and some are affirmatively regul damaging. Indu this is whystry chairman upton b i, along with members of the subcommittee, have decided to undertake the difficult task of updating the key medications act of 1934. Cmunica in the eight decades since itsht Passage Congress have
Chairman, thank you. Speaking of cops on the beat, well now go to michael copps, served as acting chairman of the federal Communications Commission from january to june of 2009, and served as commissioner from 2001 to 2011. Prior to joining the commission, commissioner copps worked right here on capitol hill, and the u. S. Department of commerce. Commissioner copps, chairman copps, thank you for being with us, and we look forward to your comments to round out our panel. Thank you chairman walden, chairman upton, miss eshoo and mr. Waxman, vice chairman, former chairman, all the members of the committee, im delighted to be here. Were here today to review whether the Communications Act needs to be updated or otherwise reformed. Ive heard some say that simply because the act is old it must be obsolete. That no matter how well it has served us an act written 18 years ago cannot have relevance in todays altered world. As someone only a little younger than the original act of 19 34r, i would
Christine lagarde speaking at the National Press club. Ago the first pie in years crossed the oceans to a new world. A promise of a land where a man house, builts own his own children in freedom. In one of the great River Valleys of america, something went wrong. Centuries later, the descendents of the pioneers were neglected people. Living in a real and land. This was one of the early new deal projects. It is a concept that have been under consideration for some years before Franklin Roosevelt became president. The cirencester was looking to help improve the quality of life in the Tennessee River ballet to from control, generate electrical power and improve the lives of the People Living here. Is one of the poorest regions in this country. It is a serious attempt at areas. G the social this weekend, and look at the history and literary life of chattanooga tennessee, today at me. A panel of four rural fcc chairman talk about the impact of last tuesdays court ruling. Before theed commer