so if they want to bring him in and have him talk all about the criminal activityq donald trump has undertaken that wasn t charged, we re happy to have that conversation. speaking of that,xdñr q■ me actually play for you something that mark pomerantz told nicolle on thise1 program last month abt guilt and evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. watch. we thought all of those thingsqxd pointed in the direct of prosecution. but there s açó real debate abo what are the standards to apply. i feel very strongly, as i wrote in the book, that it has to be the same standards. the decisions whether to bring criminal charges is notñr a political decision. it s a law enforcement decision. and it needs to be made by the same criteria that prosecutors use ayiq we go about our busine day to day in case after case. where do you think this case ist( headed, congressman? well, i think what s really important to underscore here is that mr. braggok by all account isó[■ i know okhim.
delayed. indeed. after a reported bombçó threat s called into the courthouse. after theñi security threat was cleared itxd went on. the judge innb■ that case said s case ist(5a■ quote, complex but complicated. meanwhile, on mr. bragg s hush money case the whole country +! termed indictmentxd watch. we have reports that an indictment coulde1xd potentiall come as early as tomorrow, as the day after this one. that reportedly the grand jury is set tot( hear tomorrow reportedly the grand jury isxd t to hear frome1 at least one morq witness. that reporting is notq confirme by nbc news.