Page 21 - Case Project News Today

Of just chat about that. Its 100 feet higher than it is today, what is before you. By increasing the height of this project, it seems kind of inconsistent with the plan that will add office space to the detriment of residential and commercial occupants. Im rather curious what was wrong with the original proposal. I thought it was a very well apportioned building to a building that was right next to it on Mission Street. I thought that looked very, very well. Ive also been told this is a done dea...

Difference of the height and the zone height limit with the mechanicals but i wanted to point out there is some discussion about this height being out of character with the overall skyline and we worked with the developer on the issue in the past and it is true that the original proposal was over 600 feet and we werent comfortable with that because we feel its important to maintain the urban design and stepping up to the heart of the skyline and thats what this height does and it steps up here a...

So, just to be clear, what youre saying is twoyear extension. And that twoyear mark, if think didnt make that twoyear mark, theyd have to come back to the Planning Commission . Correct. Correct. Within that interim period, theyd update the design, work with staff on the design and come back as an informational item. Are you asking specifically that it go to the commission or preservation staff . Preservation staff. Staff, yeah. I would, i would actually suggest that you make that a joint discuss...

Tunnel effect thing happen. So, im happy that we can kind of just chat about that. Its 100 feet higher than it is today, what is before you. By increasing the height of this project, it seems kind of inconsistent with the plan that will add office space to the detriment of residential and commercial occupants. Im rather curious what was wrong with the original proposal. I thought it was a very well apportioned building to a building that was right next to it on Mission Street. I thought that loo...

It is gorgeous. Anyone would want to be a neighbor of that building. I do find it peculiar, though, that all of the renderings on that site, including the animation, depict mission as though it has already been approved for the increase and over a hundred feet for a grand total of 455. I think i saw a picture that stated that the top of the buildings was 375 feet, and im not sure all the documentation i have from you states 350 feet on the approved project. Forgive me if im distorting that in so...

In this proposal will significantly increase the shadows over Mission Street. Lets just go ahead and put that on the table, shall we, because its going to throw a shadow. Its going to make that creepy tunnel effect thing happen. So, im happy that we can kind of just chat about that. Its 100 feet higher than it is today, what is before you. By increasing the height of this project, it seems kind of inconsistent with the plan that will add office space to the detriment of residential and commercia...

Of just chat about that. Its 100 feet higher than it is today, what is before you. By increasing the height of this project, it seems kind of inconsistent with the plan that will add office space to the detriment of residential and commercial occupants. Im rather curious what was wrong with the original proposal. I thought it was a very well apportioned building to a building that was right next to it on Mission Street. I thought that looked very, very well. Ive also been told this is a done dea...

As a break point so condominium above that are much more valuable and that is one of the critical flaw the report to begin with thank you next speaker. Good afternoon supervisors. I want to thank supervisor david chiu has worked very hard over the weekend to bridge the gap. Were 25 feet apart and youre going to say whats the big deal of 25 feet . And i am telling you its a very, very big deal. First of all i want to remind you if you look at the area there is nothing over 400 feet and this parti...

Pores thousands of the books there and they should be able for people who want them, but just the dumping of yellow pages that happens throughout the city its hostile to the environment. Its bad for our recycling system and i just i strongly disagree with the thinking that this type of pub occasion is deserving of what the court says protections and the court has done this to the speech and it is what it is. We are still bound by the laws interpreted by the courts so i am reluctantly supporting ...

Its without recommendation. Is that correct . No. You could put it out with recommendation or without recommendation. Oh im sorry. Thats our advice. When a ceqa appeal is pending but not other land use appeals. Okay. So this appeal is not a due process appeal . Can you explain a little bit . Sure. The reason for the advice on ceqa appeals is has nothing to do with due process issue. Its whether the board can take approval actions during the appeal process. And for the appeal and due process appe...