Casey Plus News Today

Assessing the regulations against. whether they imposed a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman before viability. and if a prohibition like this law isnt a substantial obstacle, then nothing would be. the issue was squarely before the court, and, in fact, the court said at page 879 that in adopting the undue burden test, it was not disturbing the viability line. >> its a very interesting question. i think justice barrett raised, too. its usually just philosophical, but i think it has bite ...

0 standard of self-has proved difficult to administer and that is relevant to the analysis. and i want to give you an opportunity to respond. >> yes, your honor. the first point id like to make is the undue burden test is not at issue in this case. that is the test that applies to regulations, not prohibitions. and the state has conceded that this is a prohibition. thats the title of this law. an act to prohibit abortion after 15 weeks. the only thing at issue in this case is the viability line,...