vimarsana.com

Latest Breaking News On - Central excise officer - Page 1 : vimarsana.com

Union Of India vs M/S. B.T. Patil And Sons Belgaum ... on 5 February, 2024

Union Of India vs M/S. B.T. Patil And Sons Belgaum ... on 5 February, 2024
indiankanoon.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from indiankanoon.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Haryana
India
Dharwad
Karnataka
State-of-haryana
Abhays-oka
Padmini-chandrasekharan
Rajni-mukhi
Basuva-prabhu-patil
Zile-singh
Rajagopal-reddy
International-bank

M/S Lmb Sons vs The Union Of India Through The ... on 9 October, 2023

M/S Lmb Sons vs The Union Of India Through The ... on 9 October, 2023
indiankanoon.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from indiankanoon.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

India
Raipur
Chhattisgarh
Bombay
Maharashtra
Mumbai
Ranchi
Jharkhand
Sakchi
Jamshedpur
J-deepak-roshan
Ranjana-mukherjee

No Recovery Proceedings U/S 11A Central Excise Act Unless Sanctioned Refunds Reversed In Appeal: Jammu & Kashmir High Court

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has ruled that Section 11A of the Central Excise Act 1944 which deals with recovery proceedings is not applicable when the excise duty refund has been.

Jammu
Jammu-and-kashmir
India
Ladakh
Ladakh-high-court
Service-tax-appellate-tribunal
Central-excise-act
Adjudicating-authority
Justice-sanjeev-kumar
Justice-javed-iqbal-wani
Central-excise-officer

Self-Assessment Of Assessee Not Rendered Malafide Merely Because It Was Based On A CETSTAT View Which Was Later Overturned : Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the decision of the Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) by holding the demand for differential excise duty raised against the.

Jaydeep-patel
Krishna-murari
Belam-trivedi
Vipin-jain
Mukesh-kumar-maroria
Vishnu-sharma
Prakhar-agarwal
Udayaditya-banerjee
Shilpa-balani
Revenue-department
Supreme-court
Refractories-ltd

No Justification For Not Adjudicating The Notice For More Than 13 Years After Its Issuance: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that there is no justification for not adjudicating the notice for more than thirteen years after its issuance.The bench of Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Amit Mahajan.

Delhi
India
Haryana
Justice-vibhu-bakhru
Justice-amit-mahajan
Revenue-department
Delhi-high-court
Supreme-court
Central-government
Housing-board
Central-board
Central-excise-officer

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.