you re reporting a lot of inconsistencies, but overall did this rape even occur? she could be grossly wrong about the facts or making it up or something in between. have you been able to ascertain from your reporting whether she was assaulted? that s difficult to tell, of course. her friends believe something happened to her and they believe something awful and traumatic and horrific. and those based on the evidence that they have seen, that s what they believe. i ve spoken to two people who saw her in the immediate aftermath of the incident and both of them say they absolutely believe something happened, just maybe not exactly what was reported in rolling stone. looking at the facts, one of the things is whether an assault occurred of some sort and the whole idea of putting it in the public domain and how well you do your fact checking. the rolling stone is getting barbecued by everybody about its reporting. tell me, what did you determine to be when doing your reporting
hello, i m john berman. michaela pereira is off today. we d like to welcome our viewers to the united states and around the world. breaking news at this hour. a highly anticipated and extremely controversial report due out any minute details just what cia interrogators did to terror detainees after september 11 and if it worked. any minute now senator dianne feinstein will present this report. you re looking at live pictures of the senate well. the senator will detail tactics and policies used during the bush administration against al qaeda suspects waterboarding, sleep deprivations, reservations about secret overseas prisons. the so-called black sites, all that expected to be included. what is in the report is controversial, releasing it at all is controversial. heightened security around the world because of fears the
report could spark anti-american violence. evan perez has a preview of what s in the report. also, dana bash who just spoke with senator dianne feinstein. senior
have thrown their hats into the ring. chuck schumer and bernie sanders have thrown support behind ellison. we have idea to hear of hispanic or lateen owes signal their interest for the job. bottom line, the party was not prepared for any of this at all. they need a game plan and need one fast. joining me now is likely going to be one of the people. it s congressman javier basera from the house democratic caucus. great to see you. great to be with you. let me start with the protests of the streets. is this plenty of democratic leaders said understand the protest, but don t do the violence. is this the time to protest or not? what is your message to the protesters? civic participation and
restrictions for those who try to manipulate currency to get an advantage against the u.s.? those are things if he works on it, you want to work with him? we were talking about it way before donald trump. he will find democratic support in that direction, but if he wants to tell an immigr
bill: should he step down or not? should not. adam schiff was a staunch supporter of secretary clinton while involved in the benghazi investigation and nobody s calling on him to recuse himself. devin is the chairman of house intel whether they like it or not. what we need to do is focus on the witnesses and accessing the documents and find the facts for our fellow citizens. it should not be a bipartisan investigation. let s meet witnesses. bill: nunes has said it had nothing to do with russia. if that s not the case why not clear it up? what s his source and what information was he given on the ground of the white house? on the source i found it interesting last week parts of the main street media beat the daylights out of republicans for
12 years to successfully win the electoral college. what do you want to start with? that s a good place to take our lead. bill: does that suggest you re confused what his priority is? i ve talked to mick mulvaney more than i want to i
i think the salient points made by our memo still exist and they are still true. a little bit of it is creating so much dust and clout that people just give up and saying, you are saying that, i am just going to tune out. that may be part of it too. martha: it seems like one of the big bones of contention would be whether or not it was essential to the fisa surveillance. you have argued that it was essential, that without it, they would have not received the authorization for the warrant from the fisa court. do they have you said that there is other information about carter page. you said they are basically three things. you have yahoo news article, the dossier, and other information about carter page. can they argue that other information was substantial enough? they didn t make that argument to the judge. if you have enough without the dossier, then why did you
include the dossier? if you have enough without the dossier, why did you, in your court filing, lead with the dossi