charity logos: Live & Latest News Updates : Vimarsana.com
i think it was an editorial mistake by the bbc, because as soon as you let a presenter or a reporter paid by the bbc wear some sort of campaigning insignia, however well intentioned, in that case, you open a whole set of precedents about people wearing charity logos or campaigning logos for a whole set of other things. so i think the editors and producers should not have allowed that. i suppose the counter is there are some issues on which there are no two sides, that this is something that someone on air should be able to express. yes, but would you have armbands for iran or cancer or a particular charity? her cause is great and i can entirely see why alex wanted to do it and i agree with her on a personal level. ijust think you can't have, i mean, you at the moment, ros, do not have an arm band supporting anything on this programme. and i think that's right. you are impartial and once you start wearing one armband you can wear any number. and it's not a great editorial idea. and finally to you, ayman, do you have a position on simply when you should fit into sport generally? do you think sport is escapism for all of us and regardless of where it's taking place, then you should stick to where the news belongs and leave the action alone
we all know the difference between implicit and explicit bias. there is performative moral outrage among some of the reporters. i saw a bbc reporter wearing a rainbow armband standing on the sidelines of the field in qatar. and i want to be clear, i think that's ok that she is doing that. she has a right to express herself. i wonder if a bbc sports reporter would have expressed solidarity with the uyghur muslims in china. so that was alex scott, who's part of the bbc sport team in qatar. roger, what did you make of that decision for alex scott to wear that and presumably to wear it with the agreement of her editors and producers? well, i think alex is great, and i can understand why she wants to do it. i think it was an editorial mistake by the bbc, because as soon as you let a presenter or a reporter paid by the bbc wear some sort of campaigning insignia, however well intentioned, in that case, you open a whole set of precedents about people wearing charity logos or campaigning logos for a whole set of other things. so i think the editors and producers should
of her editors and producers? well, i think alex is great, and i can understand why she wants to do it. i think it was an editorial mistake by the bbc, because as soon as you let a presenter or a reporter paid by the bbc wear some sort of campaigning insignia, however well intentioned, in that case, you open a whole set of precedents about people wearing charity logos or campaigning logos for a whole set of other things. so i think the editors and producers should not have allowed that. i suppose the counter to that is there are some issues on which there are no two sides, that this is something that someone on air should be able to express. yes. but would you have armbands for iran or cancer research or a particular charity? her cause is great and i can entirely see why alex wanted to do it and i agree with her on a personal level. ijust think you can't have, i mean, you at the moment, ros, do not have an arm band supporting anything on this programme.
wearing a rainbow armband standing on the sidelines of the field in qatar. and i want to be clear, i think that's ok that she is doing that. she has a right to express herself. i wonder if a bbc sports reporter would have expressed solidarity with the uyghur muslims in china. so that was alex scott, who's part of the bbc sport team in qatar. roger, what did you make of that decision for alex scott to wear that and presumably to wear it with the agreement of her editors and producers? well, i think alex is great, and i can understand why she wants to do it. i think it was an editorial mistake by the bbc, because as soon as you let a presenter or a reporter paid by the bbc wear some sort of campaigning insignia, however well intentioned, in that case, you open a whole set of precedents about people wearing charity logos or campaigning logos for a whole set of other things. so i think the editors and producers should not have allowed that. i suppose the counter to that is there are some issues on which there are no two sides, that this is
i think that's ok that she is doing that. she has a right to express herself. i wonder if a bbc sports reporter would have expressed solidarity with the uyghur muslims in china. so that was alex scott, who's part of the bbc sport team in qatar. roger, what did you make of that decision for alex scott to wear that and presumably to wear it with the agreement of her editors and producers? well, i think alex is great, and i can understand why she wants to do it. i think it was an editorial mistake by the bbc, because as soon as you let a presenter or a reporter paid by the bbc wear some sort of campaigning insignia, however well intentioned, in that case, you open a whole set of precedents about people wearing charity logos or campaigning logos for a whole set of other things. so i think the editors and producers should not have allowed that. i suppose the counter to that is there are some issues on which there are no two sides, that this is something that someone on air should be able to express. yes.
she has a right to express herself. i wonder if a bbc sports reporter would have expressed solidarity with the uyghur muslims in china. so that was alex scott, who's part of the bbc sport team in qatar. roger, what did you make of that decision for alex scott to wear that and presumably to wear it with the agreement of her editors and producers? well, i think alex is great, and i can understand why she wants to do it. i think it was an editorial mistake by the bbc, because as soon as you let a presenter or a reporter paid by the bbc wear some sort of campaigning insignia, however well intentioned, in that case, you open a whole set of precedents about people wearing charity logos or campaigning logos for a whole set of other things. so i think the editors and producers should not have allowed that. i suppose the counter to that is there are some issues on which there are no two sides, that this is something that someone on air should be able to express. yes.