Of creating a film archive where the films would be stored, but in the 1930s ukrainian cinema basically all left for russia, maybe something remained in the film studios, but at a very high risk, because it was not allowed, and actually in until 1994, ukraine did not have its own film archive or cinematheque, only thanks to the efforts of some very wise people, among whom were. Mr. Yakovyna and ivan dzyuba and yuriyenko. Mykola yakovyna was the deputy and acting minister of culture, so there was a period, because he was developing the charter of the center itself, then these people understood that we well, we have a museum, but we dont have our own film museum or film fund, that is, our film memory is in another state from which we are now, as it were, independent. And so began a very long process of collecting film and returning it to ukraine, that is, 30 years collected films, and we believe that it is now formal, there is no need to transfer the films to any other institutions
Wild dostoevism, which is very similar to the truth. Is this interpretation of dovzhenko close to you . It is very interesting and perhaps it is important even for us in a broader sense for understanding ourselves. And now i cant help but think about what if, kvn, how. Present in our lives, yes, which we, as it were, and we, this is some intellectual part, do not like him, but a large part of society likes it, its like such selfmockery and selfmockery, ugh, here really, there is such a precious thought that we laugh at them because they didnt win, if they couldnt with their, i dont know, their background, they could not be fooled. Er, and thats why they need to be portrayed that way, although dovzhenko, he was always ironic, he, er, his first films, he wanted to make comedies, the first films there were vasya the reformer and yagidka kohannya, these are typical, by the way, german cinema european shtibu, because in zvenigore and in the arsenal and in zemlya dovzhenko is already inventi
Dovzhenko, it seems that he constantly doubted this decision , and i saw such an opinion that stalin, for example, offered him to move to moscow in the 33rd year, it seems, dovzhenko, when you left, he offered him so that dovzhenko would not see the famine that was happening in ukraine, so that he could not somehow witness it very much close ones, although dovzhenko could not help but know. Of course, his parents were here, but his, yes, his parents were here, and it affected them, but in the 32nd year he filmed ivan on the dniproges, ugh, which was also shelved, although it was shown at the venice festival , it was the first at the first festival in venice, and perhaps the fact that both zemlya and ivan were already lit abroad, they. Were seen there, as in the case of peradzhanov, when the publicity of his film, which did not manage to hide in time, raised the voices of the world film community, and perhaps that is why dovzhenkom, well, thats how they got by, and the next film after 3
Such a valuable idea that we are laughing at them because they did not win, if they could not with their, i dont know, their background, they could not brag, and that is why they need to be portrayed that way, although dovzhenko , he was always ironic, he, his first films, he wanted to make comedies, the first films there were vasya the reformer and. Berry of love, these are typical, by the way, of european silent cinema shtibu, because in zvenigore and in the arsenal and in zemlya, dovzhenko is already inventing his own language, but these two films, vasya the reformer and yagidka, they were so typical with makeup, they were urban stories, they were very playful stories, but really there are people from such a bourgeois class, they looked weak. Not very nice, and on the posters dovzhenko also drew bourgeois in the claws of the soviet government, he also drew them unsympathetic and unattractive, and i actually remember his kharkiv period, when he also published political cartoons in th
It didnt happen, but in that interval there was another poem about the sea, i dont know if it was an epiphany or a moment of truth, the moment when he expressed it already, he said it a little earlier, he has such a phrase that our film experts included in the exhibition , the river screamed and howled as if wounded. The beast is such a story about a film study of how the dnipro changed due to the development of kaskas, ugh, and it is actually an instrument of what the construction of this gigantic project was for the soviet authorities, and this is the backward movement that we later dealt with after the russians blew up the kokhovskaya ges , and now zaporizhzhia has already suffered. Then dovzhenko, somewhere in the period of the 20s and 30s, he, he had such a phrase that between truth and beauty, i choose beauty, and it seems to me that it is his, and again yes, this is my fantasy, but it is very reminiscent of his political manifesto, because he had to either construct the truth, a