Page 37 - Cherry Pick News Today

Which is viewed as middle of the road leaning conservative a little bit and the supreme court. what do you make of this that it wont stand up? >> the critics are wrong, the district judge read oconnor got it right because he followed the statute of the affordable care act, the language of the supreme court when it ruled obamacare can only be constitutional because attacks penalty generated revenue for the federal government. now the penalty has been 0 doubt, the individual mandate has always bee...

Which is viewed as middle of the road leading conservative a little bit and then all the way to the supreme court. what do you make of the prognostications that it wont stand up? >> the critics are wrong. federal justice read oconnor got it right. he followed the statute, the text of the affordable care act. he followed the language of the supreme court when it ruled obamacare could only be constitutional because the taxability generated revenue for the federal government. not a has-been zeroed ...

Reform bill, the economy is good, promises made, promises kept. he has a positive message to run on if thats what he wanted. but he clearly made a choice and the choice is scare voters because thats going to drive them in droves to the polls and its a more effective tactic. >> if you watch his rallies than just cherry pick, he absolutely talk abos about the economic gr message. when he said its boring, he was being funny. >> right after he said that, stooe, he moved on and talked about the migra...

Guess im going to focus on the testimony here. i understand why a lot of people would have concerns testifying in front of the judiciary committee and the intelligence committee because so much of what is released these days is cherry picking information. people go in and to testify behind closed doors and some of that testimony ends up getting leaks. thats not conclusive. i can understand why anyone would have interpretation at this current stage testifying, because republicans tend to cherry p...

Period, dot end not just a judge on the social security. so if anyone has any allegations i think that they should be thoroughly investigated. we should not cherry pick who we feel like talking to just because we are under a time crunch. if this man could possibly be on the bench for two decades, three decades, four decades we can spend more than five to seven days looking into some really serious allegations. >> at the moment it is going to be one week potentially as early as tuesday or friday,...

The president and his supporters say they want transparency. this is all about transparency. do you think they could have an argument there. it would be a good idea for the american public to see more of what goes into these types of investigations? >> no, he doesnt have a good argument. the time to show evidence is when charges are brought. its called the trial. thats when the public gets to see the evidence. its not when one of the targets of the investigation chooses to cherry pick pieces of ...

Of them. he is a strict task master of a guy. i have seen him call out for illegal coaching. you dont mess with this guy. serena was, she just, totally, she lost the plot. she lost the arguments, lost the match and poisoning the atmosphere for this great kid, this 20-year-old, naomi osaka. >> do you agree? >> i think theres a double standard. i have called far fewer tennis matches than mary, but video surfacing this weekend of ramos not calling similar penalties against djokovic and murray. >> c...

Suggestion that one of the reasons people have objected to your nomination is, i believe, the quote was you have republican blood flowing in your veins. it strikes me as a strange and bizarre statement. >> ive been a judge for 12 years, senator. im 307 opinions, im very proud of that record. been an independent judge for 12 years. youre not, as a judge, youre not a republican or a democrat as a federal judge. >> and you talked about a little bit about the constitutional basis for a judges obliga...

Objected to your nomination is, i believe, the quote was you have republican blood flowing in your veins. strikes me as a strange and bizarre statement. >> ive been a judge for 12 years, senator and im 307 opinions and very proud of that regard and been an independent judge for 12 years. youre not a republican or democrat as a federal judge. >> you talked about the constitutional basis for a judges obligation to apply existing precedent. could you expand on that more? most people are under the i...

>> it strikes me as an important point. one of the reasons people objected the nomination was i believe you had republican blood flowing in your veins. this struck me as a strange and bizarre statement. >> i have been a judge for 12 years and i am very proud of that. >> you talked about the constitutional bases for a judges obligation to apply existing precedent. can you expand a little bit on that more. most people are under the impression that this is a discretionary matter and you can cherry ...