Page 5 - Circuit Split News Today

In 2017, the Supreme Court decided Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, 137 S.Ct. 1773, addressing due process concerns related to personal jurisdiction where many plaintiffs were residents of states outside the jurisdiction where the lawsuit was filed.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1782, a District Court may compel a resident individual or company to provide discovery for use "in a proceeding in a foreign or international tribunal.

The top 10 non-compete law developments in 2021 demonstrated a continued hostility by lawmakers and courts toward noncompetition and no-hire agreements, as well as the need for...

Them, so, in other words, there are thousands and thousands of cases for which people want the supreme court to take a look at them and in which they could say yes but they take a small fraction of those, and some of the cases that they are focused on are things which are called a circuit split which is actually a split amongst the courts of the country and they need to resolve that split on a particular issue. in other words, if youre in alabama, the federal courts are saying one thing whereas ...

Constitutional issue but on the other hand we dont have a circuit split where different courts are deciding the issue differently and if you look at the decisions, theyre air tight. i dont they the supreme court will say we need to come in and fix that. >> i think it was a 68-page opinion, i think it was unanimous across all three -- >> it was. >> -- their judges. so if the court, if the supreme court did intervene and grant cert and take this up, what would that tell you about a court that john...

Coin toss as to what he does. i think its going to be a 50/50 call. >> wow, interesting. and a federal appeals court ruled against former president trump as he has tried to keep his white house records from the committee. trump is now vowing to take this legal battle to the highest court. one of our viewers wants to know how likely is it that the supreme court will decide to hear the executive privilege case involving trump and the national archives? what do you think? >> yeah. so i actually thi...

Challenges. you dont get to take things to the supreme court. its up to the supreme court whether they hear it. i actually think theres a good chance the supreme court does not take this. i think, look, the reasons the supreme court takes cases is if theres a circuit split, if different circuits around the country are deciding the issue differently or if its a close question of law. i dont think this is. if the supreme court says no, were out, then this ruling that we got today is final. executi...

And other trump allies that they cant testify because of executive privilege? >> it really is a nail in the coffin i think of the meadows arguments. meadows already was fighting a very uphill battle when he claims he is covered by executive privilege. now this all but answers the question. as kim was talking about the big question is will the supreme court take this case. donald trump has this thing he loves to say. im taking it to the supreme court. he said it with his election challenges. you ...

Your rights are more protected in some areas of the country than in others. That's the conclusion reached by Reuters and its...

Supreme Court’s decision in Van Buren v. United States resolved a decade-long circuit split concerning the exceeds authorized access clause of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act CFAA endorses the narrower reading of CFAA adopted by the Second, Fourth, and Ninth Circuits