So, its like you can be a general and at the same time commander of the southern forces, i dont know. Damian so, you were an ambassador at some point in some other country . Mauricio yes, yes. My rank is ambassador because wethe Foreign Service is a career, as a military career. And i have been ambassador, and my last post was portugal, by the way. Damian all right, theyre playing now in the confederacion as well. Welcome again to the show. Were here to talk about a very important topic because president trump, and you can see how powerful his tweets are, he tweeted a couple of weeks ago that now we need to build a wall because mexico has become the second either deadliest or most violent country in the world. Ill let you respond to that. Well show you some video of what he means, go ahead. Tell ustell us what youwell, give it your response. And here were looking at obviously some of the things happening along some of these states in mexico. Mauricio okay, yes, of course. Everybody kno
So, its like you can be a general and at the same time commander of the southern forces, i dont know. Damian so, you were an ambassador at some point in some other country . Mauricio yes, yes. My rank is ambassador because wethe Foreign Service is a career, as a military career. And i have been ambassador, and my last post was portugal, by the way. Damian all right, theyre playing now in the confederacion as well. Welcome again to the show. Were here to talk about a very important topic because president trump, and you can see how powerful his tweets are, he tweeted a couple of weeks ago that now we need to build a wall because mexico has become the second either deadliest or most violent country in the world. Ill let you respond to that. Well show you some video of what he means, go ahead. Tell ustell us what youwell, give it your response. And here were looking at obviously some of the things happening along some of these states in mexico. Mauricio okay, yes, of course. Everybody kno
Here on cspan2. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] hello, everyone. Thank you so much for being here at the Georgetown Law School Supreme Court institute. My name is elizabeth, and im president of the constitutional accountability center, a nonprofit Public Interest law firm, think tank and Action Center dedicated to the progressive promise of the United States constitution. Cac is delighted to be hosting, cohosting this event tonight with the Supreme Court institute and major thanks to dory bernstein, the institutes director. We have a great event here tonight to talk about the important question of the future of access to courts. As many of you know, while this room is a mock courtroom of the Supreme Court, when you stand outside, you see inscribed over the arch of the door equal justice under law. But for many people, their search for that justice ends on the steps of the courthouse, becau
Attorneys discuss whether federal courts will reverse recent rulings that made it more difficult for individuals to sue in court. Cohosted by the Georgetown University law center and the Constitutional Accountability Center, this is one hour 30 minutes. Hello, everyone. Thank you so much for being here at the Georgetown Law School Supreme Court institute. My name is Elizabeth Wydra and oppression of the Constitutional Accountability Center, a nonprofit Public Interest law firm, think tank and Action Center dedicated to the progressive promise of United States constitution. Cac is delighted to be cohosting this event tonight with the Supreme Court institute and thanks to the institute director. We have a great event here tonight to talk about the important questions of the future of access to courts that as many of you know, while this room is a mock courtroom of the Supreme Court, when you stand outside d. C. And described over the arch of the door equal justice under law. But for many
Thats a valid interest, correct . Correct. Well, if in a case like this where theres a 45 deviation, something of that order, then why isnt texas required at that point to to recognize that these interests that are legitimate under the constitution which are voterbased should not be accommodated and so that you should at least give some consideration to this disparity that you have among voters . Well, first off, the court in gaffney upheld the use of population while recognizing that there could, there was in new york at least, a different state a 29 voter definition. Yet the court said it was quite sure that a prime prima facie cd not been made out. To while a state does consider representational quality and electoral quality, the equal protection clause as general language doesnt mandate that either must take precedence over the other. So, of course, it would be legitimate for the state to look at that data. At the same time, and we have federal census data which is the most row bes