A previous oped by the author gets at least this particular person into details about some anecdotes. In an anonymous book as opposed to with your name attached to it or keeping it to your self and thats an issue a lot of people are going to be looking at or keep quiet until youve left the administration. Host you are at the white house every day. What did you learn . Guest . Over the last two and a half years. People were asked to boil down their talking points to one bullet point even as opposed to three or five. That is known at this point. It doesnt make the book less important but its not i dont think landing with a major impact because a lot of what is in here is stuff that has become conventional wisdom. Host is there anything that you said thats not true . Guest im not in a position to say that about some of the things in here. We get a lot of access that we are certainly not in the room for everything for all of the comments that he make us. So im really not in the position to
Cspan2. Now on book to be jeff mason and joel klein discuss a warning which is reported for a behindthescenes look from a Trump Administration from an anonymous source. You been around this town for a long time did you learn anything from anonymous . I dont think anything is startlingly new in the basics, its a critique of term presidency that we heard a lot in red in the same author in the New York Times and ominously, i think you learn the depth of the concern of this particular person and interesting details about antidotes. I thought one thing that was interesting was to learn the rationale for addressing this in this fashion and in an ominous book as opposed to with your name attached to it or keep it to yourself. I think thats an issue that a lot of people will look at the book and trying to figure out why do it this way and why attaching name to it or keep quiet until you left the ministration. Your down at the white house every day, what did you learn. A did distill some things
So what are the things i thought was interesting was to learn the rationale to address this in a fashion other than with your name attached to it. But that is an issue that why not attach your name to it . You are down at the white house every day what have you learned quex. To dispel some things that we already knew and one was his reaction there wasnt any major disclosures that surprised me because for much of the reporting of President Trumps style or to go into briefings for their talking points are put down to one bullet point that is known at this point. That doesnt make the book less important but thats not necessarily landing within a major impact because there is conventional wisdom. If you say no thats not true quex. I am not in a position but we get a lot of white house correspondence and certainly we are not in the room for everything. So im not in a position to judge. The book is written with the air or tone of a thorough one authority may be somebody who knows what the wh
Without objections. We are now going to proceed with Opening Statements. I wish you all the good morning and welcome to the fourth hearing of the public buildings and sanctimony and one of the purposes of this is to protect taxpayer dollars by ensuring that theyre spending it offensively and with transparency and that brings up with todays hearing which is entitled the tenant in the Trump Administrations oversight and the International Hotel and you can tell from the title guy were going to be in investigating an unprecedented tuition and the houses President Trumps d. C. Hotel. Since President Trump has declined to confess from his businesses, hes essentially acting as both landlord and the ten it. Before i was elected to congress i spent over three decades Teaching College students about American Government politics. In those classrooms we, had serious discussions about the role of the legislature if the executive branch with legal and ethical standards and thats exactly what we had
inaudible without objections. We are now going to proceed with Opening Statements. I wish you all the good morning and welcome to the fourth hearing of the public buildings and sanctimony and one of the purposes of this is to protect taxpayer dollars by ensuring that theyre spending it offensively and with transparency and that brings up with todays hearing which is entitled the tenant in the Trump Administrations oversight and the International Hotel and you can tell from the title guy were going to be in investigating an unprecedented tuition and the houses President Trumps d. C. Hotel. Since President Trump has declined to confess from his businesses, hes essentially acting as both landlord and the ten it. Before i was elected to congress i spent over three decades Teaching College students about American Government politics. In those classrooms we, had serious discussions about the role of the legislature if the executive branch with legal and ethical standards and thats exactly wh