This is the difference between the march 7th referal from the Sunshine Task force, am i right that march and not the previous april is a controlling one and then our own memo putting it in front of us, and maybe, maybe that is just informal guidance and we change and we can go back and make a motion that says, we do or do not find miss patterson responsible for whatever of the three things that we think that she might be responsible for. And i say that because she has stepped up to one of them. And but as to the other two, whether we have given the papers in front of us can we find the Arts Commission responsible if that is our determination two or three. What is the march 7th letter. The Users Association and the defendant ant is the Arts Commission. Right. And so, i think that we could fine the Arts Commission, by. Right. And i am talking about this, so maybe we just dont track this, that is, and mr. Warfields comments and maybe this is not, this is just a description or a summary fo
Throughout that investigation the task force to figure out that aspect of it. In which it would be a Department Head and then, that, i would suspect possibly a letter or an email that would give miss patterson authority to represent the commission on all aspects of it. On all three things that we are talking about, rather than just, it seems as if we have one piece of it we just dont have, i hate to say it, i person to name on the other aspects that are alleged violations. So, how should we handle this . Mr. St. Croix do you have a suggestion . I think that in terms of the first violation, you know, there is not a contest. Do we have a finding. In terms of the other two, if you wants, Additional Information to the staff and to gather if you could refer it back to staff under section 3. And staff will do whatever investigation they need to do to find further information, to identify in this case who the actual custodian records is. The sunshine ordinance identifies the custodian records
Miss patterson was instructed to do something by someone at the Arts Commission, that if she acted in her capacity as whatever her employment was, she acted in it and it is really the. I think that it is not the figment of the Arts Commission. It is the employee who had the responsibility and who reacted in a certain way. I think that i largely agree with that. Except that i would be a little bit more general. I think that if you sent, the commission has the freedom in my mind to send a representative to this meeting. And as long as that person has knowledge, and could help us in the process and has the authority to bind the commission and i am not as concern as precisely. Whether it is the custodian of the records and i think that under any of those standards that miss patterson would meet that requirement here. And and i dont think that it is a Department Head violation that should be under three and that is a Chapter Three violation to which the Sunshine Task force deference maybe i
Bihar News: In Muzaffarpur district of Bihar, a Multi Hazards Safety Clinic will be set up at MIT to conduct research on loss of life and property during | BLiTZ