potential prosecution before they even see the evidence. this is personal money. wasn t trying to hide, this is seven years ago statute of limitations, and i think in your heart of hearts you know too that you think this is just political, and i think that s what the rest of the country thinks and we re kind of tired of that. kevin mccarthy presuming to speak for the entire country. paula reid starts off our coverage where prosecuting are facing a deadline to make any decisions on any charges. reporter: this was the day former president trump claimed he would be arrested on charges related to a hush money probe, but there is no sign yet of an arrest or even an indictment. still, law enforcement continues to prepare for possible protests. in washington, d.c., barriers erected around the capital. in new york, police officers told to be in uniform and ready for deployment. so far officials say there are no credible threats despite online chatter calling for civil
the new york times reports attorneys for former national security adviser, john bolton, and announcing a date for him to appear before closed doors. all of the closed door testimony is making republicans angry, although it s not unusual. as frustrating as it may be to have the hearings go on behind closed doors, the hearings for which congressman schiff is residing, they are consistent with the rules. in january of 2015. who signed them? john boehner. and who signed them? a republican majority. lindsey graham criticizing the impeachment process and call for a house vote to initiate a former inquiry. the process you re engaging in of the questioned impeachment of president trump, is out of
cameras, could be john bolton, the president s former national security adviser, who was alarmed by what appeared to be pressure on the ukrainians, by mr. trump and his allies. how much of a game-changer would that be? you heard the republicans say the whistleblower had second or third-hand information. and some of the testimony that we ve seen, indicates that john bolton was concerned of what was happening with the ukraine deal. he told his advisers i don t want to a part of this, quote, drug deal, of what s happening with the president s closest advisers and yukraine. he would be able to fill out the holes in the testimony and provide the details about what was happening behind closed doors. republicans are continuing to complain about the process, even though the process is pretty standard. the john boehner process. they complain about the
to have the hearings go on behind closed doors, the hearings for which congressman schiff is providing. in january of 2015. who signed them? john boehner. and who signed them? a republican majority. lindsey graham criticizing the impeachment process and call for a house vote to initiate a former inquiry. the process you re engaging in of the questioned impeachment of president trump, is out of bounds. it s a substantial deviation of what happened in the past of impeachments of other presidents. senator graham was involved in the 1998 impeachment of president clinton. the origins of the russia probe is a criminal matter. the justice department escalating to review to give it the power to subpoena witnesses,
general. i hope that continues. there s no reason to think that this is a setback, i home. not sure that will quiet the critics. not the only major legal distraction. during the world series, rob drake apologized for calling for an assault rifle and calling for civil war if trump is impeached. drake chose the wrong way to convey his opinion. before we go, stephen colbert revealed something on late night that he had never seen the movie shawshank redemption. that blew my mind until this one, christine romans, revealed the same. nor forrest gump. i haven t seen those movies. what do you do? do you chuckle along? i know the cultural references. when people say, you have to do something, sometimes i don t do it.