Latest Breaking News On - Civilian use - Page 8 : vimarsana.com
Neue Regierung im Amt | Jüdische Allgemeine
juedische-allgemeine.de - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from juedische-allgemeine.de Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
it wasn t meant for the battlefield. it s meant for civilian use. that s what 40 plus states in the united states are enjoying today. jillian: can you talk about what this means? i mean this is a three decades old ban on assault weapons and the judge comes in saying this violates the second amendment. the bigger picture here of what this means? yeah, the bigger picture comes back to the second amendment, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed and unfortunately we can still carry, that important supreme court case being heard right now about new york, it s really all about making sure that people know that we have a right that s pre-existing and these judges, these representatives are supposed to be upholding that right and keeping that right protected, not trying to restrict it. griff: antonia, does this as we look ahead to the 2022 midterm
doesn t have much practical merit and the bans haven t shown any significant effect in preventing mass shootings. is there any proof that they even work? there is absolutely proof that these restrictions do work. so i find that factual inaccuracy to be really disappointing to hear. certainly it is important that we have an intelligent and thoughtful conversation about how we define what is appropriate for civilian use for self-defense. i think the irony of this situation is that if you look at the judge s opinion, he talks about these weapons being appropriate both for the battlefield and for home defense. and i just want to pause for a second and mention how absurd that is of a statement, that the same weapon being appropriate for the battlefield and home defense certainly doesn t speak to it not being an assault weapon. so certainly we can have a conversation about these weapons and whether they re appropriate for civilian use. on top of that, there is a fair number of studies that
certainly it is important that we have an intelligent and thoughtful conversation about how we define what is appropriate for civilian use for self-defense. i think the irony of this situation is that if you look at the judge s opinion, he talks about these weapons being appropriate both for the battlefield and for home defense. and i just want to pause for a second and mention how absurd that is of a statement, that the same weapon being appropriate for the battlefield and home defense certainly doesn t speak to it not being an assault weapon. so certainly we can have a conversation about these weapons and whether they re appropriate for civilian use. on top of that, there is a fair number of studies that show that assault weapon restrictions, both at the federal level as well as the state level, are effective at reducing mass shootings and other fatalities. you mentioned the language the judge wrote. the judge wrote, quote, like the swiss army knife, the popular ar-15 rifle is a pe
Atommächte gegen neue Atombomben, aber für eigene Massenvernichtungswaffen
heise.de - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from heise.de Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.