online, people drawing their own conclusions about what happened, and this will also be in the review today. this will also be in the review toda . , ,., this will also be in the review toda. , ., today. anneli, this report has now been published today. anneli, this report has now been published in today. anneli, this report has now been published in the today. anneli, this report has now been published in the past - today. anneli, this report has now been published in the past few- been published in the past few moments. i know you have to have a chance to have a look at it, what are the main findings? this chance to have a look at it, what are the main findings? chance to have a look at it, what are the main findings? this has “ust been published fl are the main findings? this has “ust been published in i are the main findings? this has “ust been published in the i are the main findings? this has “ust been published in the last i are the main findings? thi
now. let alone the day before the big event is planned in washington. hered chief of staff called the house sergeant at arms to raise the alarm and say what is going on here and the following day thefo capitol was attacked. and it was a week after the attack a that congresswoman of w jersey made these claims public. and shees made a request, it waa form of a letter cosigned by 33 members of congress and requestedme that the sergeant a arms and the u.s. capitol police and the senate investigate this matter and we write today to request an immediate investigation into the suspicious behavior and access given toav visitors at the capil complex on the day before the attack on the capitol. many of the members who signed this letter including those who have served in the military are trained to recognize suspicious activity and members of our staff and we witnessed an extremely high number of outside groups in the capitol complex january 5th.