Clausec 2 News Today

We dont know how they were using this money is not factually true. You heard mcclk chin tok saying he had the mcclintock saying that he had the prosecutor fired. Yet those talking points are respited despite the fact theyre not based on fact. Its an important moment. I want to get your sense of the history of what were about to see. You see the members showing up, the staff, theyre showing up. The witnesses will be there. Theyll be sworn in as well. Its a moment that doesnt happen very often if ...

Whether you think thats good or bad and matches the abuse of powers is an open question. And then he goes through and argues he doesnt see what he calls a statutory crime. And well see that debate as well. There are people youre going to hear from who are going to say its got to be an actual felony and then there are going to be other people pointing out the constitution doesnt require that. It has words like treason, bribery and high crimes. So were going to get into the weeds here, but the big...

Chairman. you can ignore it and not answer it. you cant say its not -- >> aim asking for the rule of -- >> we will apply the rules, period. >> you wont help us understand that? >> there is no clarity there. >> how are you siding that? >> clause c 2 of the judiciary impeachment of procedures. i would -- >> how is that unclear? >> its the rules of house and they will be applied. period. >> im asking how will they applied here, sir? >> they will be applied according to rules. >> but not answering y...

>> everyone voted. has everyone voted who wishes to vote? >> miss bass. >> misbass votes aye. >> the clerk will report. >> mr. chairman, there are 24 aye, 17 nos. >> the motion to table is agreed to. >> mr. chairman, i have a parliamentary inquiry. >> the gentleman will state his parliamentary inquiry. >> thank you, mr. chairman. clause c 2 of the judiciary impeachment inquiry procedures states that members of the committee can raise objections relating to the admissibility of testimony and evid...

>> you stated a rule. you cannic nor it and not answer it but you cant say its not proper. >> im asking for the application of the rule and an explanation. >> we will apply the rules, period. >> you wont help us understand that? >> theres no clarity there. >> which rule are you citing? how are you citing? >> clause c 2 of the judiciary committees impeachment inquiry procedures. >> how is that unclear? >> its the rules of the house and they will be applied, period. >> im asking how will they be a...