Page 65 - Clauses News Today

Scored the need for appropriate use of commas in the paper. both inclusion and omission. and lists ten different extremely detailed examples with explanation. we activated the alarm, but the intruder was inside. that is correct. im shr you already knew. because those are independent clauses with separate. that last comma the oxford comma. hotly debated. among grammar types. it does get a thumbs up here. how about this one. he stood up and open td his mouth, but failed to remember his question. t...

Preceded this individuals candidacy for any federal office. is that a campaign contribution? >> short answer there is no. mark: and why not? >> well, its not because it doesnt arise out of the campaign, and the key thing that you said there, mark, is that this happened before the campaign was going on. the events that give rise to it. and under the federal election campaign act, anything one spends to campaign is expenditure on one part of the law, but the law contains other clauses that focus o...

Congress is the binding law, what is signed by the president. its whats gone through the senate and the house and that is the law. also as a practical or functional matter, having seen legislative clauses i know how compromises come together within the house and senate, within the senate, the house. theres negotiations late at night over precise words and compromises, inevitably. the constitution is compromised. legislation say compromise. and when we depart from the words that are specified in ...

Complementary of each other? >> theyre both supporting the concept of freedom of religion. in the nudow case i wrote, i tried to explain some of those principles. its important to think that to begin with, youre equally american no matter what religion you are, if youre no religion at all. that its also important to -- the supreme court has said that religious people be allowed to speak and participate in the public square without having to sacrifice their religion in speaking in the public squa...

All. so the coercion idea i think comes out of both clauses as well. the cases that are establishment clause cases that dont involve coercion but some of the more -- the symbol, the religious symbol cases, as you well know, senator, thats a complicated body of law. each area of that has to be analyzed in its own silo. as a general matter, i think its good to think of the two clauses working together for the concept of freedom of religion in the united states which i think is foundational to the ...

Complementary of each other? >> i think in general its good to think of them as both supporting the concept of freedom of religion. and in the case i wrote, i tried to explain some of those principles. i think its important to think that to begin with, urie kwally american -- youre equally american no matter what religion if no religion at all. it is important the supreme court has said religious people be allowed to speak, participate, enter the public square without having to sacrifice their r...

Sieshlgs jim, i saw y . >> jim, i saw you shaking your head. >> im under no obligation to say nice things about the president. from time to time im critical of this president on this show and other cnn shows. amanda, youre just flat-out wrong about the disparagement part of this. >> i read it. there is clauses about nondisparaging the president. is ivanka trump doing a good job? do you think ivanka trump is doing a good job? >> amanda, youre talking about -- >> i asked you a question. you said i...

Amanda, youre just flat out wrong about the disparagement part of this. >> i read it. theres clauses about not disparaging the president. is ivanka doing a good job? do you think ivanka trump is doing a good job? >> amanda, youre talking about -- >> i asked you a question. >> an nda that related to the campaign. >> let him answer it. >> you dont get to ask the questions here. i get to speak just like you did. >> go ahead. >> in this instance, youre talking about government officials, and you are...

Has receipts. how deep they go is intriguing. putting aside what you think about her character and ethics. obviously there are criticisms of both, she suspeis producing tapes and they do matter in the court of public opinion and to the court of law. don jr., one of the clauses that struck me was the clause about how any politician would have taken the meeting. that is ridiculous. not true. most politicians would have referred the inquiry to the fbi because that is what you do in those situations...

Whether or not it happened to his knowledge or not is irrelevant in a legal perspective. >> hardball tonight chris asks omarosa do you have anything mueller would be interested in and she makes a point to say if he calls me again, absolutely. did that get your attention? >> yes. yes. you know one of the underlying elements of the book toured is that she feels deep regrets and has receipts. how deep they go is intriguing. putting aside what you think about her character and ethics. obviously ther...