Page 89 - Clauses News Today

On social media. this is going to trial, how high or low is the bar here for the prosecution? >> this petition has tens of thousands of signatures. i want to read something from katlyn hunts attorney. high school relationships may be fleeting but felony convictions are forever. >> if it is a felony conviction not only do you have prison time but it stays on your record forever. the law is the law. and at 14 years old in florida you are not considered able to consent to a sexual relationship. >> ...

Device. go to section 921. it defines a destructive device as any explosive incendiary, explosion or poison gas, bomb, a charge of more than four ounces, a missile with more than one quarter ounce, a mine, or a device similar to any of the devices as described in the preceding clauses. thats a whole different definition. a grenade or a bomb is not the same as a nuclear weapon. and it is strange that different agencies in our government define weapons of mass destruction so differently. the defen...

Of mass destruction covers some of the same stuff as the defense department definition, but it also adds this part. so nuclear or chemical or biological, or any destructive device as defined in section 921 of this title, ie explosive device. go to section 921. it defines a destructive device as any explosive incendiary, explosion or poison gaza, bomb, a charge of more than four ounces, a missile with more than one quarterouts ounce, a mine, or a device similar to any of the devices as described ...

Tied ding up. >> heather my love i am broke all i own is this car. besides that i have 5,000 dollars. but really i have a $20 million real estate portfolio. if you werent able to bring that to court. the court wants everyone to have clean hands. if you were lied to you are a document. >> second if coercion was involved. >> if you dont sign right here i am leaving they are losing their money all your friends you are an embarrassment you have to sign. no good. >> if the pre-nup had unenforceable c...

Reviewing the subject, were reviewing the subject. of course, to answer your question, it comes down to whether they agree on the issue or not and weve seen that again and again. if states are doing something that the administration approves of, then they kind of close their eyes and wink. if its something they dont agree with we do know that the justice department is capable of very actively litigating those things they dont like. >> david: well, dan, theres another example, defense of marriage...

Reviewing the subject, were reviewing the subject. of course, to answer your question, it comes down to whether they agree on the issue or not and weve seen that again and again. if states are doing something that the administration approves of, then they kind of close their eyes and wink. if its something they dont agree with we do know that the justice department is capable of very actively litigating those things they dont like. >> david: well, dan, theres another example, defense of marriage...

Now the front line of the health care battle in this country. will ultimately determine whether the new clauses in the social contract uniformly apply across the country. joining us julia arekoosh and former minute of mitt romney advisory group, author of the apothecary. tia mitchell, tampa bay time, miami tallahassee bureau. and joy reed. great to have you here. tia, you broke this story. what change -- flip-flop say term that gets overused in politics. but this is a flip-flop. >> this is. and ...

Is. they did sign something, these people. what does it say? >> they did sign something waving some liability but the cruise -- they didnt pay a lot of money for the cruise. you want a bargain but all the securities you have to pay for with a high-priced cruise. >> anna, because were going to run out of time, i want to give you a chance. shes laying out and interesting case. i dont know if they didnt pay a lot per ticket. $50 might be a lot for the experience they just had. youve looked into the...

If they want them to speak could be used five years from now against law abiding citizens who agree with them and force them to do things and say things they dont believe in. this is why the clauses were written in the constitution to guarantee an area of human behavior thought, speech, silence, commercial activity that should be immune from government interference and government bullying. >> we know there is a difference between a private citizen speaking his or her mind and the power, the powe...

Cut off relationships with law abiding entities. they are following the law it is just that they dont like their chosen business. you have the power of government pressuring them. is it even legal? >> the answer to the word is no. there are some well-known and not so well-known to prohibit this. one of the clauses is a contract clause. it basically says state governments or city or municipal governments that are formed in the state cannot interfere with contracts that are freely entered into tha...