information that really the fbi, he s arguing, should not have access to. however, the judge in this case keeps asking him who are your clients? tell us who your clients are that could be potentially impacted by this. and so far, i mean, i was in court all day yesterday watching this unfold. and each adjournment y. there were two or three all day, and the judge kept asking his attorneys who are these cliernt and the government s position is all they know of is that michael cohen has one client, that s the president. the president, other than that, he has no other clients. and up until about 4:00 when the judge kept asking michael cohen s attorneys for the claims of the clients, they had no provide herd with any of the claims. she said i m giving you until monday to do this, because the government needs to know who is affected by this privilege you re arguing over? it s going to be quite a spectacle when stormy daniels shows up too in the courtroom on monday as well. i know you re goi
shooting. now it is important to point out those demonstrations were largely peaceful. today veteran officer jason van dyke is behind bars. he s charged with murder. earlier today van dyke s attorney defends his cliernt s actions. it is not enough to make the determination that one officer s determination is better than my clients. and video by its nature is two dimensional and it distorts images. so what appears to be clear on the video sometimes is not always that clear. joining me now to talk about all of this, cnn legal analyst and criminal defense attorney danny savalas. and community representative and
to do. they have to react moment to moment. they did up to the point where the shots were fired. yeah, as a matter of fact, i have done that exact thing, breaking out a window for a belligerent, resistant person. here s what a local paper cites. documents that quote ferrell s attorney as saying his cliernt was flat out scared that something was going to happen to her children and that is the reason she filed a plausible defense. is that a plausible defense? absolutely not. it s complete ignorance of the law. it s simple. you don t you don t escalate the situation, take off. you obey the officer s orders, take your punishment in terms of a ticket and get on with your life. you don t think it escalated and all of a sudden, the officer started to bash out the window and she gets scared like oh, my gosh what is going on? it was necessary to do that. he wanted to extract the 14-year-old. he wanted to make sure that car couldn t continue. he had already seen she was traveling at