Thanks for joining us. Lets take a quick look at the weather. Weve got our meteorologist lisa argen up on the roof. Hi, carolyn. Its very nice up here right now. Dry, mild. Were looking at another mild day. Live doppler 7 hd shows a weak cold front to the north and west of us. Providing a little bit in the way of a drink of water which we need across the bay overnight tonight. You can see the rain. Weve had a few sprinkles around the coast, cloverdale and clear lake. Overall, were looking at the mild temperatures out ahead of this system. 54, Half Moon Bay. 60 in oakland. San jose, 68 for you. Mild portion of this system allowing for very mild temperatures, not only throughout the Morning Hours but with the cloud cover in the afternoon, we will still reach the upper 60s along the coast and the lower 70s elsewhere. So a few breaks in the clouds are likely in the south bay. Thats why well be so mild. Even up in the north bay, were looking at mild temperatures. Behind it, winds pick up. T
November 5th. Hi, im marconi im here to discuss prop b the measure will be before the voters on test november 5th. They have a proposed site called prop c is an referendum. A referendum is the process by which the voters can proof or reject legislation. A 3 point plus acres is on washington street. On 2012 the board of supervisors approved the construction of two mixed used buildings containing 3 hundred residential units and a properly operated fitness space and under parking. In approving the project they adopted the ordinance to there the height limits. The referendum be submitted to the voters for approval or recreation. It will not take effect unless its pass see if you vote yes. You want the ordinance passes which influences the height along drum street if you vote no. You dont want the owns which increases the heights to take effect. Prop b which also concerns the washington site qualified after prop c it would create woodworking parks and housing district. The sdrishtd would in
Hi, im with sfgovtv im here to discuss prop a that will be before the voters in tuesday the health care truth fund was for health care correspondents that would substantially there. The 5 member board passed the fund they mate not use the fund to pay for the costs until january 20, 0200. Preparing will allow the bodies to make payments from the fund only as the cities account balances to fully funded it has to be large enough to pay for the costs as theyre due and thus, the cities total payroll costs cant go over 10 percent. They must allow the payment and theyre limited to no more than 10 percent of the cities account or the governor and the trust board passed it. They would allow only if the agrees fund account or twothirds of the agencies Funding Board and the trust board productive. A yes vote means you want to change the charter from the Health Care Trust funneled only under specified circumstances a no vote i dont want to make those changes. Im here with supervisor marking feral
Feral and he proponent of preparing thanks. Having me. Id like to start with supervisor farrell why do you believe this prop a is important i started working on this when our city controller said we have a 4. 4 blindfolds liability. Number one we have retirees who worked long and a hard tossed the city of San Francisco and workers that are feasor full. Thats something we want to avoid and fight against we want to make sure that our seniors have their health care that were second of all the costs for our city a hundreds of thousands of dollars. This year as chairman of our committee b it will grow to 500 million a year over the next 20 years were so preparing prop a does make sure that our cities retirees and their health care is priority for in the further. In thirty years our 4 half a billion dollars liability will be wipedout off the books and well save a lot of money from 5 hundred memorial days a year down and those hundreds of dollars of Million Dollars dollars will go toward neig
And pay the employee the sum of 5 hundreds as a petition for a writ of men and women democrat and all possible claims against the district will be dropped. In arbitration matters and case and u. S. Grievance number case no. Ar b12 dash 2 r7 the board of education approvals a supplement prudent to which the district will make 62 bargaining unit members. Cumulative totally 500 plus in exchange for a dismissal claims relatively to the 2012 low implementation. Do we have the vote on the last item 4 is one a bit estimation. So in the matter of g l vs. The San Francisco Unified School District case no. 20168 percent 2 the board of education gives the authority of the district to pay up to the stipulated amount. In the united Education Matters pe rb case the board of education approved by the vote a supplemental prudent to which the district will pay 3 hours of extended hours pay to special education teachers in certain specified clarifications. Less applicable taxes and withholding for the p