To the planning code sessions. We can provide you with references and there are copies for the public. We would provide zoinning regulations regarding generalized building heights. This is a complex project. This is protecting the public interest. All of the developers in the city. We will consider the Draft Development agreement which was submitted to you today. This is part of the Development Agreement with the other Affordable Housing provisions. This is with the transportation and the water, maintenance obligations, and recovery for all the City Projects relate to the implementation the full discussion and a full discussion as set for the commission hearing. As for the amendments set for today, he will not be asked to take any action on the Development Agreement before certifying the impact report. Assuming you will initiate a day, on no. 18, youll have the totality of the project to implement the peace is for your consideration. The amendment to the planning code and the Developme
Welcome to the San Francisco Planning Commission regular hearing for thursday september 26th. Please understand that there will be no disruptions at this time and when speaking to the commission please sfurmd if you care to id like to take role at this time. Commissioners first on your collapsed are items for continuance. Item a b is for 447 c at the 19th avenue and 2011. 77 at 19 hundred avenue to be considered for continuance to november 21st, 2013, you further im pleased to announce we received a written notice that the dr at the brood rick street has been withdrawn for item 19 interest let me just confirm yes. Thats all i have commissioners thank you. Is there any Public Comment on the two items proposed for continuance. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed commissioner wu. I move inform continue items one a. On that motion to continue to item to november 21st roll call calling names . So moved colleagues that passed 6 to one id like to ask item two to are continued as well as. Th
Thank you continue with our presentation. Sir, did you want to complete our slide presentation. The last slide is what i went through the completion of the funds. Thank you very much. Mr. Rich that concludes my presentation. So mr. Rich i have a question for your. How are we going to pay for the park the 37 million how again you dont know i dont have an answer today, i, tell you that the mayor is committed to making sure it happens the source in front of us is the mel ruse were going to find a different source. I guess the question is with the mel ruse how did this decision be made whether or not the park is paid for out of the mel ruse. I can tell you its an eligible cost theres nothing that needs to change in terms of the progress i think i need from someone else but in terms of the project we need that. Essentially supervisors its similar to our annual progress we bring the agency to project the revenue and have the parks be part of the expenditure plan it will come before you as pa
Residents in that arena. I know im being specific to the district i represent because im most familiar with that. And weve been working with the hotels which is a lot of billions and buildings and a lot of double up for that inspection. Supervisor scott weiner thank you supervisor kim, with that, if there are no additional comments, i would suggest that we entertain a motion to continue this item to the call of the chair. Can i have that motion . Okay. Well take that motion without objection. Thank you, everyone. Madam clerk, please call item no. 4. The clerk item four, inter agency Plan Implementation Committee annual progress and planning Code Development impact fee reports. Good afternoon supervisors, kirsten from the Planning Department. Im here to talk about the inter agency plan and the committee report. Im going to call it as an abbreviation. This is to talk to you about ever year about our plan for Development Impact fees in each of the area plans and to talk about which infras
For Building Code enforcement. As you know dbi is an Enterprise Department and dbi has collected 40 million more in fees than you have expended. This enables them to fund necessary infrastructure repairs including systems. The civil grand jury found the dbi Building Code enforcement policies and practices resulted in a significant backlog of unresolved notices of violations. For example dbi does not have a standard that required nov to be resolved in a specific time period. Nor does dbi have the ability to produce management reports to identify cases open in the time period standard. Only 54 percent of the novs issues are closed out within 90 days and only 72 percent of the novs issues are closed out within 12 months from the date of issuance. That means that 28 percent of the novs take over 12 months to be resolved and 11 percent of the 28 percent are never resolved. The civil grarj grand jury found out that inspectors. Supervisor scott weiner yes, we are happy if you want to send us