united states refused to accept the results of the 2020 election. he refuses to accept the will of the people. he refuses to accept the fact that he lost. he has abused his power and put the loyalty to himself before loyalty to the constitution. a typical year, we re often not faced with questions of whether the vote we cast will preserve democracy or put us at risk. but this year, we are. and the last standard bearer of the democratic party, president barack obama campaigning in arizona, the state that perhaps any other battleground state has been roiled by the big lay with election deniers on the republican side picked up on the same themes, laying out for his audience, the stakes in this election this way. i lost my first congressional race in the primary by 30 points. i got whooped. i was frustrated. that didn t feel good. you know what i didn t do? i didn t claim the election was rigged. i didn t spin conspiracy theories. i didn t instigate a mob to go up on and stor
home. she was shocked when that happened. it turns out that grassley sent three letters. i provided the letters in a link to my column, in which he offered to fly out staff, do it confidentially, privately, take her testimony. this national disgrace, as kavanaugh called it, could have been avoided. but i m wondering whether these lawyers who were recommended by diane feinstein sean: there s a conflict of interest. whether they never told her about it. and that would be a violation. sean: bingo. of the code of professional responsibility. i cite the code sections in my column. sean: she was like, oh, you offered that? thank you. she said thank you to senator grassley. lindsay graham called for an investigate eight of these lawyers. were they acting on behalf of democrats and not in the best interest of their client? sean: great find. victoria brings up another topic here. that is, if you re going to look
home. she was shocked when that happened. it turns out that grassley sent three letters. i provided the letters in a link to my column, in which he offered to fly out staff, do it confidentially, privately, take her testimony. this national disgrace, as kavanaugh called it, could have been avoided. but i m wondering whether these lawyers who were recommended by diane feinstein sean: there s a conflict of interest. whether they never told her about it. and that would be a violation. sean: bingo. of the code of professional responsibility. i cite the code sections in my column. sean: she was like, oh, you offered that? thank you. she said thank you to senator grassley. lindsay graham called for an investigate eight of these lawyers. were they acting on behalf of democrats and not in the best interest of their client? sean: great find. victoria brings up another topic here. that is, if you re going to look
sean: she was shocked when that happened? it turns out that grassley sent three letters. i provided the letters in a link to my column, in which he offered to fly out staff, do it confidentially, privately, take her testimony. this national disgrace, as kavanaugh called it, could have been avoided. but i m wondering whether these lawyers who were recommended by dianne feinstein there s a conflict of interest. whether they never told her about it. and that would be a violation sean: bingo. of the code of professional responsibility. i cite the code sections in my column. sean: she was like, oh, you offered that?? thank, you. she said thank you to senator grassley. lindsay graham called for an investigate of these lawyers.as were they acting on behalf of democrats and not in the best interest of their client? sean: great find. victoria brings up another topit here. that is, if you re going to look into the lawyer feinstein
strong point. you have an obligation under the lawyers code of professional responsibility to confer with your client about anything important in the case. okay. now, trump was his client. who is going to believe that trump wouldn t be consulted about this contract? the other argument that michael cohen made is this has nothing to do with the election. though this was signed, you know, within two weeks of the election. paul, does that hold water for you? no. i mean michael was helping the president get through an election. it was a reasonably intense election. i imagine it took a bit of his attention. the notion he would within days of an election take five minutes out of his day to do anything except donald trump is just not plausible. whether it s a legal violation, i have no idea. we ll let the employelawyers pl out. there s a new pew research today looking at all the demographics. republicans are facing a meltdown among women. they re trailing among all women by 56 to 37.