can t talk on his own.. it s not a right wing conspiracy theorist and on its w real effect, it s so real.in hipis campaignra concedecys thas real. that true, fetterman uses a software program to understand the words of those around him and to formulate his responses to those words. in other words, to talk. alk. now, to be perfectly clear , this software is not a hearing aid. dea fetterman doesn t need a hearing aid because he isn t deaf, he s not hearing impaired. instead, hearing this program tt words and then rearranges themhe into language that john fetterman can understand unden no longerin ca do that for him. sad that s sad for transhumanist, it is thrilling. this is an amazing moment. this is neil armstrong hav on the moon. here you have one of the most famous politicians in t the country merging with a computer. com this is the futureputer.. dhey imagine they re thrille by it. but for everyone else, for foe voters of pennsylvania, for example, it does raise some obvi
of course, as well, as you pointed out, bravely. and so fluently. destroying the cultures apprxactly the point of the exercise. exactly. and i i can t tell you your comh i appreciate coming on and saying that. john mappin, god bless you. thank you. you. dr.. now, you might recallr: we the last we spoke to an entrepreneur called ariadntaae jacob. busin she told us that she lost here business because of liesof written by thelies washington pt technology reporter taylor lorenz. now, is suing lorenz and her former employer. our friend harmeet dhillon is representing jacob and so many others are meeting himder f as the ceo and founder of the center for americanjoins liberty. she joins us tonight t.on ami , thanks so much for comingu on . so tell us what this suit alleges. well, as you mentioned,tucker tucker, taylor lorenz notoriouss crime bully, who s jumped around from various publications and is now at the washington post , has made her career out of clout, stature chasing and i
everyone. i m going rogue for just a moment. al i justl got to say thank you to all the subscribers and supporters of this service at cnn.s plus, this is a worthy venture. this is an outstandingt experiment. let me try outme - a theory on t which is it s too early to know if this product or this service was a successs or a failure. sa youyi know, you got all the haters today saying . is thing was a failure i don t know if we can even ever assess that because it just simply didn t have enough timeug because of the management change and direction. so we spent three hundred million dollars. it lasted for three weeks, but we re not really sure. was that a success or a failure ? hard to know what is going on inside cnn. well, we want to talk to someone who used to work there. old friend rick sanchez is a former cnn anchor and abu longtime veteran ofsi this business, the news business ceo of our media. he joins. rick, thanks so much for comingu on . what do you think happened here? it s pret
professor at george washington university. i think you were comingu on. this is an investigation that went from trying to determine if russia had an effect on the election outcome and is now looking at real estate transactions in the united states between chump companies and russia ten years ago. how do we get from one to the other? the mandate that was given to mueller was perhaps ther most vague and ambiguous mandate i ve special counselor. it s basically one line that says investigate the selection controversy. nothing else. there s no specific specific reference toto crimes. you canfe drive a semi through that language, that s what s going to happen. what people need to understand is that a special counsel investigation tends to have some mission. it broadens with time. if you start with a very broad language, they will fill that space and go beyond it. i think that mueller is going to be able to fit the financial