Page 3 - Command Influence News Today

Pierce that layer into the inspecter general knowing this ig is not someone that could be influenced in that way. so i think that hes half right. the doj was politicized but i dont think that seeped into the igs office. >> i want to play what he said for our viewers in case they missed it. >> the president publicly demanded a result and the office of the inspector general delivered that result. i know they struggled to do so. some of the documents that we have been able to review in the last few...

The president was communicating with her under a pseudonym to her private email account so what you saw was a lie. he knew she was using a private server. he knew it because he sent her emails using a pseudonym. do you know what? thats the kind of thing that makes people sick of politics. there is obama lying through his teeth and he knew that she had a privateng server. he knew there was classified information because when you communicate with the president, that is classified. automatically. a...

There isnt any question she broke the law. the president was communicating with her under a pseudonym to her private email account so what you saw was a lie. he knew she was using a private server. he knew it because he sent her emails using a pseudonym. do you know what? thats the kind of thing that makes people sick of politics. there is obama lying through his teeth and he knew that she had a private server. he knew there was classified information because when you communicate with the presid...

Agencies, and i dont think we dont have a weaponized agency that is going after this individual which is why i am very happy that president trump tweeted out that he was going to review the case. what hes doing is shining a spotlight on this. >> judge jeanine: later is talk, colonel hunt, that this review is something that is improper, the president exerting unlawful command influence. is that hogwash or is it accurate? >> everyone considers that in the chain of command but this is the united st...

Agencies, this happened in 2016, when he went on fox news, and obama wasnt a fan of fox news. i dont think it was a coincidence. what we have is weaponized agency that is going after this individual, which is why i am very happy that president trump tweeted out that he was going to review this case because what he is doing is shining a spotlight on this. >> judge jeanine: will talk about this review, there is talk, coronel hunt, that this review is something that is something improper, the presi...

He says he is reviewing the case now. there are some who have noted that the president making that public statement could create an unlawful command influence and gum up the works in this case. whats your reaction to hearing from him? >> as far as im concerned, i dont know what the implications might be as far as the law is concerned, but he is the commander in chief. if he feels that action is not being taken in a proper way, as he learns more about this situation, we are in favor of him doing ...

Explosive that killed those two marines. there was confirmation of that in afghanistan. >> martha: what happens now? on what grounds was it reopened and what impact might the presidents comments have? >> the comments by the president when he tweeted yesterday, there has been a lot of talk about that being unlawful command influence or could be. i have been doing this for close to 20 years. i have never seen a prosecutor bring an unlawful command influence motion against a higher authority. the p...

Commander-in-chief or any of the generals would like to step in and do the right thing that is not considered undue command influence. >> sandra: the afghan man died february 28, 2010. there are so many different narratives about what happened that day. what does your husband want us to know as we continue to follow this story? >> ill just say this. during the board of inquiry in which the army found him -- they cleared him of wrongdoing, they actually had the investigator from c.i.d. in the arm...

Since he did say he was going to step in and review this case. some saying that he may be exerting unlawful command influence. we have heard that from some military experts. however, a general weighed in on it and wrote an opinion piece published on fox news.com. president reviewing the case writing citizens and soldiers are innocent until proven guilty. the height of irony to deny a combat veteran the constitutional rights he so bravely fought for. what do you think will happen here with your h...

Unarmed detainee, even if they were a threat at one point, is not permitted under rules of engagement. i guess the interesting case here is president trump stepping into this case is making it unique in that rarely do you see the commander in chief weigh in directly on a case like this, and its something that there are concerns about command influence, whether or not he is going to alter the course of this case. the department of defense saying its a law enforcement matter and theyre going to re...