๐ฐ Commerce Clause News
Page 107 - Commerce Clause News Today
Fast, Ad-Free News Updates
Stay updated with breaking news from Commerce Clause. Real-time updates on events, politics, business and more.
July 7, 2023
(Washington, D.C.) -- Iowa Congressman Zach Nunn is co-sponsoring a bill in response to a recent ruling in the Supreme Court regarding pork production.
July 7, 2023
Posts about sb 396 written by Mike Masnick
July 7, 2023
NetChoice has been quite busy the last few years suing to stop a wide variety of terrible state laws designed to mess up parts of the internet. It took on Floridaโs social media content moderation law and won (twice). It took on Texasโ social media content moderation law and won at the district court, and…
July 7, 2023
The Supreme Courtโs recent opinion in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.. concerned the constitutionality of a Pennsylvania statute providing that registering to do business in the...
July 6, 2023
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -TikTok Inc on Wednesday asked a U.S. judge to block enforcement of a Montana state ban on use of the Chinese-owned app before it takes effect on Jan. 1. TikTok, which is owned by China's ByteDance and filed suit in May, asked U.S. District Judge Donald W. Molloy to issue a preliminary injunction to block the first-of-its-kind U.S. state ban on several grounds, arguing it violates the First Amendment free speech rights of the company and users. TikTok Global Business ...
July 6, 2023
TikTok estimates 380,000 people in Montana use the video service, or more than a third of the state's 1.1 million people
July 6, 2023
WASHINGTON: TikTok on Wednesday (Jul 5) asked a US judge to block enforcement of a Montana state ban on use of the Chinese-owned app before it takes effect on Jan 1. TikTok, which is ow
July 6, 2023
Video-sharing platform argues state ban violates free speech rights of the company and its users.
July 6, 2023
Tiktok Ban: TikTok, which is owned by Chinas ByteDance and filed suit in May, asked U.S. District Judge Donald W. Molloy to issue a preliminary injunction to block the first-of-its-kind U.S. state ban on several grounds, arguing it violates the First Amendment free speech rights of the company and users.