With respect to the appellants allegation that the housing accountability act applies, we would disagree with that assertion. Adding twobedrooms does not make you eligible under the housing accountability act has been the citys position. We do not see this as something you would have to approve, or the Planning Commission will have to approve. Even the unit otherwise we would not be here. Being code compliant, they would not need it for that reason. That is not even what is before anyone, because we have a building that is technically before you. The third unit is again just added. That is not what is on appeal. What is on appeal is the two unit building. The concern of the displacement of the tenant, 30 plus years, as i understand it. The commission did not think that this was appropriate project, the end of the day. They denied the application. I am available for questions. You commented on the haa, which im glad you did. What about the argument that there are constraints on the Plan
Reason. I have a new project that can go back to the commission, rather than a lastminute change to the scope of the project. With respect to the appellants allegation that the housing accountability act applies, we would disagree with that assertion. Adding twobedrooms does not make you eligible under the housing accountability act has been the citys position. We do not see this as something you would have to approve, or the Planning Commission will have to approve. Even the unit otherwise we would not be here. Being code compliant, they would not need it for that reason. That is not even what is before anyone, because we have a building that is technically before you. The third unit is again just added. That is not what is on appeal. What is on appeal is the two unit building. The concern of the displacement of the tenant, 30 plus years, as i understand it. The commission did not think that this was appropriate project, the end of the day. They denied the application. I am available
And determination. There is a lot of new information that the commission may not have had, for whatever reason. I have a new project that can go back to the commission, rather than a lastminute change to the scope of the project. With respect to the appellants allegation that the housing accountability act applies, we would disagree with that assertion. Adding twobedrooms does not make you eligible under the housing accountability act has been the citys position. We do not see this as something you would have to approve, or the Planning Commission will have to approve. Even the unit otherwise we would not be here. Being code compliant, they would not need it for that reason. That is not even what is before anyone, because we have a building that is technically before you. The third unit is again just added. That is not what is on appeal. What is on appeal is the two unit building. The concern of the displacement of the tenant, 30 plus years, as i understand it. The commission did not t
As part of the process were before the eastern neighborhoods on june 15th of this year they unanimously supported the increase in the in kind agreement and i want to read a couple of changes to the in kind agreement what we realized in the last week the fees is actually the total fees and not for the eastern neighborhood fees that is the only thing to get a waiver so in article 3. 1 the fees owed from 4. 4 million plus to 4. 02 m. D. 88 and for the record the remainder amount owed to the city goes from 2 million to 1 million plus that concludes my presentation. Thank you. Thank you. Opening it up for Public Comment not seeing any Public Comment is closed. Commissioner moore. Thank you so for staying on top of that one of the biggest dangers to take the fees out of the quality of the project were 0 doing the opts this is very wise including the City Attorneys Office is asking the increase in wages it is a winwin for everybody weve spent quite a bit time on the project when the issue of
Been proven to be successful. Conditional use permits, in my experience with other neighborhood groups have kept out formula retail and businesses that dont conform with the character of the neighborhood. One speaker mentioned this moratorium [ inaudible ] thank you. Next speaker, please. Hi. My name is Marie Sorenson and im part of calle 24th i hope everybody can hear me, because a lot of people dont talk very loud. I would like to invite the previous speaker and some of the open 24 people to come to our meetings. We went through we have been around for years. And we have have had meetings for years, and now all of a sudden people are saying oh, well, they are not inviting us. Okay. Im beyond that. One of the things that i would like to talk about is the fact that we have 33 bars and restaurants on our street. I think that is enough. I dont think we really need anymore. Were lucky enough to have a hardware store, health food stores, vegetable stores, meat stores. We have a nice variet