Millions along to you i said did you agree with that assessment of i mean this is serious stuff we could law for 23000000. 00 on pools of amphitheatres in a country where half the population lives on less than 5. 00 a day you accept a net and lets use no its not a question of accepting or not accepting part of the challenge that we have is that part of that is actually Government Property which was actually for purposes of ensuring that there are Health Facilities nearby for the president to be able to be looked after or any of the stuff in 2016 there was a Landmark Constitutional Court ruling that said. Jacob zuma should pay some money but it also ruled against the National Assembly that you were speaker saying you would quote fail to fulfill its constitutional obligations to hold the president accountable thats a thats an indictment of you years a speaker of parliament is not an indictment of an individual because the individual actually does not determine the position that parliamen
A country where half the population lives on less than 5. 00 a day you accept lets use no its not a question of accepting or not accepting part of the challenge that we have is that part of that is actually Government Property which was actually for purposes of ensuring that there are Health Facilities nearby for the president to be able to be looked after or any of the stuff in 2016 there was a lot more Constitutional Court ruling that said. Jacob zuma should pay some money back it also ruled against the National Assembly that you were speaker saying you would quote fail to fulfill its constitutional obligations to hold the president accountable thats a thats an indictment of you years a speaker of parliament is not an indictment of an individual because the individual actually does not determine the position that parliament or the National Assembly actually end up taking. Democratic alliance versus speaker of the National Assembly shall you because i am the leader and therefore on be
At 4. 00, the burden of that additional cost to the individual that is coming from a low Income Community. The other is, while i may be very interested in sustainable practices, does not mean my coworkers are as well. I am concerned that while we are going to put a burden on the businesses to charge 25 cents, i am concerned there will be a counter act of not going after not compostables that are more expensive because they will be charging the people for them until they would just find a cheaper method of charging, because it is no longer seen as a positive thing that we are offering a compostable as an alternative. Thank you. Thank you. My name is moses. I am the ice cream business. I believe you all know that i volunteer. The only thing i have a problem is that, how can i tell the tourists to bring your own cup . It is ice cream. How are we going to give them a reusable cup . If we want to charge them 25 cents because it is a tourist area. This is a tourist trap. Trap. Trap. I dont t
Is not what i am picking up here. I expected actually to hear quite a bit more aggressive talk in opposition. Instead what i heard was a lot of willing to work with each other, trying to get to that spot. I would just caution you from going too far down that aggressive, sort of us versus them. It doesnt actually look to me like us versus them. We should probably try to foster more of that working together to make this as effective as possible. With all due respect, you should see my email inbox right now which is a lot of response. I think people want to ease into this. That is what im hearing from the other side. I agree with commissioner laguana. I did not hear the negativity. It is just the easing into it. Commissioner zouzounis, you know, said of the best and we have seen this with other legislation. That is the fema fee mitigation. I think if you ease into something, you know, let them get rid of whatever they have on hand. Also, with the composting. We all had to go into the comp
Stuff, i love going to my local places and they are all going away. I would like to come up with something that is a winwin on both sides. What that is . I dont know. Im trying to get feedback. I like what william said here, you know, maybe if there is something we can get back, or something you said, like low hanging fruit with fees. I will point to the ordinance that was presented, item number three was a recalculation of fees that brought fees down that makes a placket system easier to comply with. Lets not look at this as a stick, it also does not exist in a vacuum. We are at the fate of the restaurant hearing just two weeks ago. If there is an right now for carrots for Small Business, it is right now. I do not think that this ordinance is going to kill restaurants. Im sorry, i dont think so. I look at an email sent out by the California Restaurant Association that disparages this as a tax, which says this is making changes to the bussing requirement that its not making. It says we