Page 4 - Commission Practice News Today

Tunnel, so, we have it in the 10year plan and its a joint asset, which its jointly owned by water and power. And, so, we have in our 10year capital plan about 100 million to go in and reline it. And, so, that was the original plan. And then while going in there, doing more investigation, we had an engineer look at what the impacts would be. And given the fact that it could collapse, we are now very concerned that not only we wouldnt be able to produce power, but it would shut off the water suppl...

To go in and reline it. And, so, that was the original plan. And then while going in there, doing more investigation, we had an engineer look at what the impacts would be. And given the fact that it could collapse, we are now very concerned that not only we wouldnt be able to produce power, but it would shut off the water supply to san francisco. And, so, when we developed the we step, it was about seismic reliability. And we knew it was an issue with the lining, but we didnt know the magnitude....

Perhaps, you should be articulated. Also, i think the time period was 18 months in 2007, im not sure, but looking back at these times it was a soft ending. Not three years and in my opinion the approval process for 801 brannan street and they promised to build the same building but they did not. Those are my thoughts. Thank you. Good afternoon, commissioners. Sean rba. The last five years have been very unique. Money is starting to return and while we look at the landscape and cranes. Those cran...