Response we go out and we go out and try to see the child within a twohour period and so that can be situations where we will go out, and with the police are, and go to the scene, and it could be where the police may bring in the children to our Child Protection center, and because if the parents incapacitated or in cars rated and you do not have a care giver that child is brought in and that requires a immediate response. The ten day response, might be a situation where there is not, as urgent of a need and the child is in not in danger but we need to go out and investigate and find out what is happening. So if it comes in and goes to the investigations, what the investigations does, is fails to make a series of decisions, and they go out and the interview the child and the parents, and the contact and get the information from the police, and what they are looking at is, whether we are going to open up, this case, and make it an active case for us and, there are two ways that a case c
In the home, one of the and some of the tools that we use, and i know that, there is concerns in the community, about the rolls of cps and the people have talked about the distrust of cps based on a lot of the history and the things that we do is support and work with the family and keep the Families Together and one of the tools that we use is called structured Decision Making and it is trying to differentiate what are the immediate safety threats verses what are the general risks. Fl safety threats are dangers that are immediate and what we are concerned about is a danger that is unmitigated and the risk is anding like alcohol abuse or homelessness or Different Things and that is not a danger but it is a concern and . Ing that we want to help the family with and we are not going to remove based on risk and we are going to move on a safety threat and i mentioned that it has to be an ununmitigated safety threats and there are threats that can be viet violence in the home and physical a
With us on cases that can follow up with the families after we have done our investigation or during the investigation and that person works with us, and to look at a not just from the cps but from the Community Perspective and provide the community engagement. And so, in that process, which often involves like i said the rilely center, we make the decision of whether we are going to keep a case open, and whether we are going to have the child in the home and out of the home and part of the mandate is to have the least restrictive placement for children and so we try to keep the Families Together the least restrictive is with the parents and that is our goal, if the child can be safe and we want them to remain in the home, one of the and some of the tools that we use, and i know that, there is concerns in the community, about the rolls of cps and the people have talked about the distrust of cps based on a lot of the history and the things that we do is support and work with the family
15 million is estimated that it will contribute to bringing the train downtown and now the accumulative effect of these project are certain not enough to pay for the train box but it gives San Francisco the opportunity of having local fund to be used to be leveraged with other funds to accomplish that and its an extremely important benefit benefit and so i urge you in the course of actions that you have been taking and to add this to your achievements thank you. Thank you. Good evening commissioners tim col ron on behalf of the housing commissioner and is ill be brief it was a really enthusiastic reception for this project at our meeting last week. One of our well known members said this is a killer project this is the first exoskeleton that we have reviewed and this particular, one of the thing that we really liked was the bridge to the park and we are building a very large New City Park 75 feet in the air it needs very large connections to it to ensure that its well used and so there
The amendment offered by the gentlewoman from california. Those in favor say aye. Those opposed, no. In the opinion of the chair, the noes have it. The amendment is not agreed to. Ms. Sanchez mr. Chairman. I request the yeas and nays. The chair the gentlewoman ask has asked for a recorded vote. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule 18, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from california will be postponed. It is now in order to consider amendment number 4 printed in house report 113455. For what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition . Mr. Lamborn mr. Chairman, i have an amendment at the desk. The chair the clerk will designate the amendment. The clerk amendment number 4 printed in house report 113455 offered by mr. Lamborn of colorado. The chair pursuant to House Resolution 585, the gentleman from colorado, mr. Lamborn, and a member opposed each will control five minutes. The chair recognizes the gentleman from colorado. Mr. Lamborn thank you, mr.