Before the january 6th select committee. As i just said, schiff says, look, were not messing around here. Criminal contempt charges will be filed quickly if anybody defies a subpoena. How do you see this playing out, laura . Well, you know, unlike last time when you had thumbing of the nose of people who had previously been subpoenaed, you have a very different white house, a very different attorney general right now, who has been very adamant about the idea of the rule of law coming first. And what this means, of course, is that subpoenas are supposed to be complied with. The average person couldnt just say, nah, i dont feel like doing that and ignore it. Remember, anytime somebody wants to challenge the validity of the subpoena or the questions they want to respond to through privilege, you have to still do that on a questionbyquestion basis. You cant just say executive privilege might be extended. Therefore, im not going to come at all. You have to address it. So the idea of using t
Those of you here in the audience and people who are joining us virtually. With the election less than three weeks away, it is important to remember it is essential to preserving our democratic republic that we have secure elections in which every citizen who is eligible to vote is to cast a ballot. We want a process in which when it is over everyone agrees, even the candidates who lost and their supporters that we had a fair and honest election. How do we do that . That is the question today. It begs the question, are comprehensive election audits a way to achieve that goal . In depth audits of elections are almost nonexistent yet indepth financial and accounting audits are standard practice. Heritage has published a new study explaining this issue available online. It is called best practices and standards for election audits. I encourage you to read it or download it. Today we have three experts with us to discuss this very important question. The honorable senator paul that in cour
Want 2. 0 jim lapel that was handcuffed to the Harvey Oswald is your. [applause] you might want to save your applause because i have a lot. And seated very close to him is the dallas jeopardy cherbourgs on the sixth floor that day also phyllis Paul Anderson from the hospital who was in trevor remember one when kennedy died also the timelife bureau and he said at the time of the assassination and we also have judean read to wes the press aide at the time of the assassination and one of the first reporters inside this building at all after the assassination and also our narrator for the audio version and can be heard through the exhibit today. Over here i do want to go to this very quickly we do have eye witnesses. A reinvest photographer at the plaza and then the closest civilian eyewitnesses to president kennedy at the time of the shooting is james here today . I am not sure. That is okay. We hope all is well with jim and the tenth juror selected for the jack retrial is dr. Williams ye
Try to identify the conservation practices that would be clearly exempt from having to have a clean water permit was something we worked on directly with the department of agriculture. What did the army corp of engineers say. They were coauthors of the rule. So they provided you input . They helped write it. Okay. If Small Businesses have never obtained a permit under the clean water act before, how do they know if they will need to get a permit under this new rule . Well it depends on what their action is. Are they discharging pollution. How will they know whether their action requires it. If you discharge pollution, you have to get a permit. I mean its the current law. Well, they may know that now but have never had to do it before. How will they know if this additional rule will require them to do a permit. Well, if you do not have if youre not regulated under the clean water act now under the existing existing regulations, you will not be regulated under this proposal. Say this aga
Minutes ago, you said the Supreme Court has said that the epa needs to do rule making. I think thats what i heard you say. I think what the Supreme Court actually said is that under the law, you have the authority to do rule making. I think thats what the Supreme Court said. I think what the American People who by the way all three branches of the federal government is subject to, the American People, i think what they expect the epa to do is to provide a responsible, Regulatory Environment that protects public safety, protects public health, but that does not disadvantage american businesses and American Workers and cripple our economy. From the shut down of the coal industry through epa regulations, through the strangle hold that epa regulations have over our manufacturing sector, you name it. Thats why the American People and congress dont trust the epa. Let me go into a few questions here with you. You know theres enough new definitions and new ideas in this rule making that its ob