hello and thanks for joining us. i m abby phillip here in washington. now, president biden makes it official. just moments ago, the u.s. is sending abrams tanks to ukraine. that announcement comes just hours after germany revealed that it will send its own leopard 2 tanks to ukraine. germany had been reluctant to do that but ultimately they bent to weeks of intense pressure from western allies. cnn s phil mattingly is over at the white house for us. but let s begin first with our own jim sciutto. jim, can you walk us through what we are talking about here? what are these tanks, and where are they coming from as it relates to what s going into ukraine? reporter: abby, this is a significant move and let s begin with what the capabilities are. this is a german leopard tank then you have the u.s. sending abrams as well. first thing to say about this, highly capable, it s an offensive weapon, not a defensive weapon and the ukrainians hope here, their aim is to use this as a weap
along with congressman byron donal accountas and john james i roy and republican conference confchair, at least the phonic. now, coming up, we will dove headfirst into the republican agenda from investigations to oversight to the abuse ofg power to removing fang fang s boyfriend from the intel. committee. weamittee. special look at the u. penn biden center for diplomacyo engagement made possible, itt appears, by the communist party of china.y afte now in 2014, shortly after acade establishing the academic center all in biden s name and appointing appointing the former vice president to lead the new department, 50 former million dollars in anonymous donations from china magically just poured right into the coffers. and the coffers. watchdog demanded that these sketchy donationsnd be investigated out of national security concerns. and now lndo and behold, breaking this week, a trove of top secret classified documents, including sensitive compartmented information from the oba
sean has a keg. but don t worry, it s light beer so y all will be fine. all right. great to see everybody, sean. great. love you too. anyway, have a great weekend. all right. i m laura ingraham. and this is the ingraham angle from washington tonight. thanks for being with us. the tock party, that s the focus of tonight s angle. well, mr. china came to washington today and it was quite a spectacle. we have heard important concerns about the potential for unwanted foreign excess to u.s. data and potential manipulation of the tick tock u.s. ecosystem. our approach has never been to dismiss or trivialize any of these concerns. we will firewall, protect us data from unwanted foreign access. can you do surveillance of other americans ? we will protect the u.s. user data and file it all from all our foreign access is a commitment that we ve given to the committee. i want to hear you say with 100 percent certainty that neither vytenis nor tiktok employees can target other america
yes. so, in summary, what is it? so, what happened was, last month, the scottish parliament, by a pretty big majority, passed this legislation and the legislation, this gender bill, seeks to remove administrative and medical barriers to changing the sex on your birth certificate. that s basically what it does. it s passed the scottish parliament and it was waiting to be given the rubber stamp by the king, royal assent. but, crucially, while the issue of trans rights is devolved to the scottish parliament, the issue of equalities is something that s decided at westminster on behalf of england, scotland and wales and the uk government says, hang on a minute, we think those two clash. and there s a line in the rule book that set up devolution a quarter of a century ago that allows us, they say, to pull this trigger and stop that proposed law becoming law and getting royal assent. that s what they ve done and it s caused one heck of a row. right, well, let s chat a bit more a
look forward to working closely with spain going forward. james in the back. i m sorry ok. i have a question, thank you. wait, wait, wait, you don t have a question, james? are you kidding me? are you kidding me? can we just have this for the record you didn t have a question. i m going to frame that transcript. simply a tribute to your loclasity and el if russia strikes nato, poland or the baltics, nato, do you have enough troops in the region right now to respond, and from day one, not five months ahead, and the second question would be many of those who called for sending leonards and abrams to ukraine argued that russia right now is too weakened to militarily too weakened to respond conventionally in a significant way. how confident are you in this assessment that russia is so weak, or maybe you have a different assessment, but many people think russia is too weak to respond in a significant way to the move that was just announced about tanks? le