Page 796 - Commitments News Today

Korean peninsula. >> well stop the war games but this is complete denuclearization. >> the presidents doubt the new relationship will ever pay off. >> north korea have made commitments in the past they have not followed. >> kim jong-un is a butcher. working with him is like trying to hand-feed a shark. >> president trump seems to have given away a couple things kim jong-un wanted without anything in return. >> bill: and now a potential treaty to seal the deal. >> the president can reach a signif...

Commitments to give up nukes and the rest of it. what we need is the strictest inspections regime on earth. donald trump did the right thing, pulled out of the joint conference of plan of action, the iran nuclear deal and part of it was the inspections regime in that deal wasnt very good. the uraniums were saying you cant look at our military bases. what we need to do is anytime -- we not only can go to where they declare a nuclear facility but can go anywhere in north korea. rob: critics say he...

President is willing to lift economic sanctions. but president trump hasaid they will stay in place for now. north korea is also claiming president trump agreed to a step-by-step denuclearization process. national security adviser john bolton and secretary of state mike pompeo are planning to continue talks with north korean officials in the next week or so. i mentioned pompeo right now is in south korea talking with the foreign ministers of both the south and japan. the meeting was planned but ...

He does ith respect to mama or anyplace else that is an american territory or american ally, he will regret it. >> tucker: they ramped up military spending, military drills and military presence and reaffirmed commitments to shid our allies from hostile adversaries. one way or similarity comes from the two presidents willingness to walk away from the table. and before ultimately negotiating the end of the cold war, president walked away from talks with mikal gorbachev. a few weeks ago president ...

In 2008? okay. so i guess record low unemployment, a thriving economy, tax cuts, destruction of isis and now a foreign policd with administration is all theyve got. even kim brought and squeezed his commitments, the left still will not give him a shred of credit. >> donald trump the real estate developer, he doesnt realize that this dictator doesnt want beach condos. he wants nuclear weapons. >> potentially empty words and lots of flags and ceremonies. and i find that incredibly

Nuclear catastrophe. if there is no longer a nuclear threat from north korea before adding north korea was our biggest and most dangerous lem. no longer. sleep well tonight. the preside come under criticism in some corners because of the one and a half page statement that he signed in singapore, spelled out no specific commitments from the north aside from working toward the complete denuclearization of the korean peninsula, a promise that the regime has repeatedly made and broken since the 1990...

Question. certainly not right now. as long as were being asked to take donald trumps word what was agreed to or what will happen in the future, any commitments are meaningless and the president himself just said as much. >> i think hes -- i think honestly, i think hes going to do these things. i may be wrong. i may stand before you in six months and say hey, i was wrong. i dont know that ill admit that but ill find some kind of excuse. >> right, ill find an excuse. that gives away the whole game...

In fact, you could argue that theyve backtracked on previous commitments. its all semantics because theres really no there there to this document. but the language that you referenced having been included in previous agreements between the north korean regime and the united states and other partners actually included stronger language. this is the weakest that has been included in any recent document that has emerged from north korea and the united states. and even president obama, when he began...

Gave up anything, made any sort of meaningful concession or promise in order to get these declarations of love from the president? >> no, clearly they didnt. in fact, you could argue that theyve backtracked on previous commitments. its all semantics because theres really no there there to this document. but the language that you referenced having been included in previous agreements between the north korean regime and the united states and other partners actually included stronger language. this...

Long processand of its you corr iranl tk a very long time to negotiate. all of these sorts of deals, previous negotiations with north korea, we have been negotiating with north korea for years and years and years,decades, in we have signed similar agreements before. we will have to make sure that no g to to its commitments. we will have to come to that pointhere they do declare what they actually have. and do have a better look inside the country. then we have to get inspectors on the ground. we...