And asked about buying 16,000 worth of ammunition. That included grenades, gas masks and rockets. Then last week muso met with an weapons dealer. He told the agent he was part a group of people who wanted to, quote, bring forth the original constitution, and thats why he needed the ammunition. He was arrested yesterday, and charged with violating a federal firearms law. Well have more on this coming up at 6 00. 9. Josh a convicted sex offenders sentence could be reduced now that the New Hampshire Supreme Court has cleared the judge in the case to change his mind. Kristen carosa is live in our lakes Region Bureau with the developments in this case. Reporter the judge first considered reducing the sentence in 2014. Now the Supreme Court says he with make adjustments if he wants to. At a review hearing today judge garfunkel heard from both the the victim in this case. Joshua baud of wakefield was convicted in 2014 of sexually assaulting a then 7yearold girl. Baud faced 10 to 30 years in p
Theyd be citizens than they would vote the way all of our freedoms. Moderator thank you, mr. Macko. Youve had an impact on people. You feel immigrations, sir. It is broken as they presently does. The first thing we need to do is secure our border. I would go about that, whether its inject tenet of the states that are on the borders and make sure we had the wherewithal to guard the borders. Moderator like ohio . Joyce we have the coast guard and the ability to do that. Down in arizona, texas in the southern border. That is something we need to have the states employ the National Guard to protect them, then so be it. We need to fund them appropriately. People say secure our border pretty frequently. I dont know what that means exactly. If it awol as david macko suggests, if it drowns . Like what does that look like . That is potentially quite a lot of borders. Joyce absolutely. We have to employ the National Guard. But they play again down there where somebody is and you cant do anything
Requires the slate of our mailers instead of filing them with the other agency to file them with the Ethics Commission so this is a onestop shopping we can see the candidate activity and the slate marital activity. You want to make a motion. I make a motion we approve that to make it possible. Second. Public comment . Larry bush from friends of ethics just a point of information while it doesnt go to the Election Department the clerk is responsible for accepting documents from youll see california and not only from San Francisco submissions so therefore they dont have a system that allows you to go down and find out the slate mailers involving the San Francisco candidates by moving it to ethics you have that access its a observe that disclosure. Any other Public Comment . All right. All in favor i. Opposed passed unanimously 4, 0 now weve gone through the items item one 2, and 4 directed the staff 67 as well but 67 is a more straightforward but directed the staff to take some further a
The ethics laws were out dated or confusing and not inadequately addressing the regulations so the Ethics Commission spent the last 11 months discussing this with the public and city officials and legal experts cross california proposition e is a result i urge you not reimpact any of the confusions of prop j. Any other Public Comment all in favor of the motion. I. I. Opposed the motion is passed turning to 5 which is environment as a penalty. Commissioner. This proposal the idea is to add a penalty for violations of the campaign refinance ordinance for those who are city contractors and so the proposal is to debarment it prohibits persons who might do business with the city and county of San Francisco from doing so or bidding on the contract for a certain determined period of time if they were to violate c from or proportions of c from i understand it on a similar provision that was impacted by the voters in los angeles and so this is the general idea the one thing well note we note no
Mailers involving the San Francisco candidates by moving it to ethics you have that access its a observe that disclosure. Any other Public Comment . All right. All in favor i. Opposed passed unanimously 4, 0 now weve gone through the items item one 2, and 4 directed the staff 67 as well but 67 is a more straightforward but directed the staff to take some further action and i would ask, sir how would you prioritize those recognizing theres a fairly heavy burden where should he start and just give me a week i know that the fcc has their regulatory calendar it makes sense that seemed the commission very much want us to move on item one we can draft the proposed language and begin our i p month to month and gathering records we could come back to you with that language in march and in march present a proposed calendar in terms of how we will go about doing this ill recommend we exclude not only this stuff but there are one or two other things that we permit consulting stuff it is clear we