is a question nobody in washington seems interested in even asking. they ought to be interested. mark steyn is an author and columnist. he joins us tonight. markham of the outlines of us are really clear. google is the most powerful company in the history of the world, they were choke hold on all human information, they can clearly guide the outcome of an election if they chose to do so. they tried to influence the last election. why shouldn t we be concerned about this? we should be deeply concerned. as you said, russia, everybody goes bananas about because they bought 100 grand for the facebook ads or whatever it was. google is already more powerful in terms of its control over people s lives than almost every government on the planet. i would say arguably, it has more control over american lives than say the government of russia does, as a practical matter. people are very naive about google searches. they think that it whether
counted records in the preelectronic records day, notn just out of the rose law firm offices in arkansas but to the private residence of thehe president and the first lady? and i was haunted by what did vince foster do as the deputy counsel to the president? he took his own life. we knew that he was depressed we had veryy significant evidene that he was clinically depressed. why was he clinically depressed? complex question but that is why i was haunted. why do this very successful, very bright lawyer take his own lifefe within six months of the administration taking power? that haunts me to this day. tucker: yeah, you are not the only one for sure. ken starr, great to see you after all these many years. thank you. thanks. i appreciate you having me on. tucker: of course. mark steyn right after the break to talk about what is and can starr s book and whatever else he would like to talk about
she describes this assistance as a silent donation. she then says that google helped them create ad campaigns to promote those rights. officially, it is a nonpartisan entity but that is a sham. voto latino is vocally partisan. recently the group declared that hispanics, all hispanics, are in president trump s cross hairs. he planned to respond to this by registering other million additional hispanic voters in the next presidential cycle. voto latino is a group with clear political goals, goals that google supported in 2016. we asked both google and voto latino for clarification, what exactly did she mean by a silent donation ?s this is a potentially significant legal question. neithered company responded to . at the e end of her email, she makes it clear that google was working to get hillary clinton elected. this wasn t a get out the vote efforts, whatever they say, it was not aimed at all potential
thank you for coming tonight. we appreciate it. go to talk to. tucker: the response we got it, i don t want to belabor it or whine about hundred but the response was so telling from the left when we asked on friday night, is it really true, the new national slogan, that the less we have in common, the stronger that we operate out of that, the question, what is it that unites us as the country? why are we a country? i have to go back to my foundational roots as a christian and i have to say, psalms 1:30 three says that the hold how good it is for brethren to gather together in unity. united states does have a christian foundation. we are not a christian nation, theocracy, but we do have our foundationalou principles-based and judeo-christian morality. and so we had to come together as one. we were unified as one. we are to bring those 13 colonies together and you needed to have something that wasto gog to unite us. that is been we came up with the declaration of independence, the
base. obviously the other big thing is abortion, you know, there e are you have said there not enough attention being paid to what the president said over the weekend about abortion rights. i want to play that key part of it. on the campaign trail, you said you would leave it to the states. well, maybe some day it will be up to the states. that s a complex question. the roe v. wade is probably the one that people are talking about in terms of having an effect. but we ll see what happens. but it could very well end up with states at some point. how did that strike you? it s consistent with what president trump has said before. i was struck to hear him say that as he had the short list in front of him. he makes no secret he doesn t see an issue with the states deciding on the legality of abortion which effectively means that roe v. wade is overturned.