economy wide response. screws and is good, discussion is good, the more people involved in taking action and engaging in taking action and engaging in climate change is better. the more private sector engagement in this issue, i think, is better than what we saw ten or 20 or 30 years ago when it was very government driven. iii when it was very government driven. ., . ~ ., driven. if we go back, at kop 27, is driven. if we go back, at kop 27. is loss driven. if we go back, at kop 27, is loss and driven. if we go back, at kop 27, is loss and damage - driven. if we go back, at kop 27, is loss and damage fund| 27, is loss and damage fund was a for richer countries to pay poorer countries suffering the impact of climate change, how do you see that working out, that has been one of the numerous sticking points? i think private sector needs to get more engage in loss and damage as well. it is just one section, it would help society, insurance needs to be more engaged, issues reg
is good, discussion is good, the more people involved in taking action and engaging in climate change is by far the better, the more private sector engagement in this issue is better than what we saw ten, 20, 30 years better than what we saw ten, 20,30 years ago when it better than what we saw ten, 20, 30 years ago when it was government driven process. it government driven process. if we go back there at cop27, a loss and damage fund was agreed upon for richer countries to pay poor countries which were suffering the impacts of climate change. how do you see that working out, because that has been run of the numerous sticking points? the has been run of the numerous sticking points? sticking points? the private sector needs sticking points? the private sector needs to sticking points? the private sector needs to get - sticking points? the private sector needs to get far - sticking points? the private| sector needs to get far more engaged. loss and damagejust one element