And this lake should be seen as a habitat primarily. And yes, like i said in the rational world, we would expect that rec and park could have the recreation and that would be done in harmony. That is not what we see in the park and other instances and so. I would concur, with your local Community Folks that live around that lake, that even though it can get unusual, it is really the sfpuc who has the expertise and showing the kind of commitment on the lands like this to actually manage them properly and so would i urge you to do everything and regardless of what you pass and i would urge you to do everything that he can to retain as much control over this situation as the sfpuc can get and that you put in rigid auditing power so that if smaoeg goes wrong you catch it fast and correct it fast and if necessary, pull back the responsibility of the commission of seeing this park to yourselves instead of rec and park that does not have a good record. I need five minutes to review the resolu
And the aspect of the program has concluded that the program and the funding our capitol plan for ten years total. I think that you would come up. And that is a concern of mine is and so now, i clearly understand it and i appreciate that and i only have one last clarification. And once we start to rule out whatever we are going to rule out from this point forward, there is going to be conversation and there is going to be labor components and we did get it back on how we will let that out and that will also be ape subject of these discussions and am i right . That is correct. The whole idea behind this is to bring our stake holders in the room and come up where they process where we can do solar on our own customers. And in a way that is ininclusive of all of the stake holder in all of the advocates and so we need to sit down and have that conversation. Prior to engaging in any of the other agencies, and the pec conversation and it is not a conversation and we are not going to reach ou
Pilot program. Will we begin to analyze that and then no longer make those references and just call it a program and a budget item of the puc . Well, it does not address that specifically, and my hope is that as we move towards a customer, you know, a San Francisco customer, based program, that, that that will have the effect of terminating it. And i dont know if we ever need to make a formal declaration i think that if we are starting with our own customer its changes character and i think that the decision to go there says that we have already conclude and there is a benefit of it. And at that point,. And if i could clarify, just, to make sure that we have the common understanding of the facts. That the go Solar Program is a Program Statute did include a section that is a Pilot Program. That Pilot Program was for the first year. So that portion of the program that was characterized under the statute as pilot concluded. I think that we have come into the habit coming into it because t
And annual report. And they will give us a very specific information and so that i think it gets us, very where we need to go and i dont expect, some of the boat house folks will be happy, with our saying that rec and park is responsible for recreation. But where we are going to disagree and i think that is an appropriate out come. And we have distributed with the package and we had the mlu and a resolution to put that in force. We have introduced some changes to the language of the mlu. And sitting next to our counsel, i have been handed an amendment to the resolution. Which will make the rest of it happen if i get this right. And that is your amendment is not in the resolution. It is not. But you are incorporating it if yeah. All right. So we are incorporating mr. Ritchis amendment and Vice President courtneys amendments . Yes. And the, just a minute. The word is. Right here. Okay. So, first of all, if i could move the item so that then i could move the amendment to it. Do you want t
The habit coming into it because the legislation was for ten years. So i think that perhaps, folks are thinking of ten years and that is the pilot aspect of it. And the aspect of the program has concluded that the program and the funding our capitol plan for ten years total. I think that you would come up. And that is a concern of mine is and so now, i clearly understand it and i appreciate that and i only have one last clarification. And once we start to rule out whatever we are going to rule out from this point forward, there is going to be conversation and there is going to be labor components and we did get it back on how we will let that out and that will also be ape subject of these discussions and am i right . That is correct. The whole idea behind this is to bring our stake holders in the room and come up where they process where we can do solar on our own customers. And in a way that is ininclusive of all of the stake holder in all of the advocates and so we need to sit down a