things that you chose not to say was that before the phone cut off, but after the bump, you heard trayvon martin say, a little get off get off? objection. asked and answered. this will be the last time the question will be asked and answered. you may answer. yes, sir. so let s move then to the april 2nd interview where you did have a chance to tell mr. de la rionda everything. yes, sir. and that was your purpose? yes, sir.
when you told mr. crump that after you heard the bump and the phone cut off that you decided not to tell him that after the bump but before the phone cut off you heard trayvon martin say, a little, get off, get off ? objection, compound question. do you understand the question? yes, ma am. you may answer the question. that interview i think lasted about 13 minutes, i don t know. didn t last that long. because i did not want to be on the phone, sir, so i did not take my time and just like i took my time and i had more time when i was talk being to the state. crump now, so the question is no. so all of the things that you thought might be important for them to know about what you
something had taken place. yes, sir. but the reason you didn t do anything about it, tell anybody what you had heard, come forward to the police, is because, in your mind, it was just a fight. correct? yes, sir. and in fact it was just a fight trayvon martin started. that s why you weren t worried. that s why you didn t do anything. it was because trayvon martin started the fight and you knew that. observation. compound question, badgering the witness, argumentive. you may answer. no, sir. i had told you before, i did not knew this man was out of jail. i don t know what you re talking
accurate words or the accurate truth? objection. compound question. complicated. did you understand i m sorry. did you understand the question? yes, ma am. could you answer it? no, sir. let me see if i can say it better then. when mr. delrano was asking questions about what happened and who said what, you were making it sound different than it actually was to keep hurting miss fulton s feelings? not all of them, sir. i m sorry? not all of them, sir. not all of the answers, correct yes, sir. but some of the answers? yes, sir. some of the answers about
that s why you weren t worried. that s why you didn t do anything. it was because trayvon martin started the fight and you knew that. objection. compound question, badgering the witness. overruled. you may answer. no, sir. in that confrontation between george zimmerman and trayvon martin, who was the aggressor? who initiated the altercation? rachel jeantel s testimony is that trayvon martin was being followed, that he was attacked. those are her answers to the key questions in this case. joining me now are former prosecutor faith jenkins, msnbc legal analyst lisa bloom, and defense attorney ken padowitz. another long day for this witness. faith, what is your reaction to her testimony? no matter how many times and how many different ways don west tried to cross examine her on the fundamental issues, she held to her testimony, and she was