are of flipping one justice on this and possibly flipping the majority on it, just on that comprehension point of exactly what are the complexities involved here? well, the fact that they issued this temporary injunction is also quite extraordinary. it s actually technically considered an extraordinary action by the court. which is another issue that the dissenters take issue with. they are only supposed to do this when the petitioner s rights here, when wheaten colleges rights are indisputably at issue, indisputably clear. they re already supposed to have an extremely strong case on the merits for a temporary injunction like this to be issued. so it is quite a signal here for them to say to us or say to the country that we think that there is a real issue here. i mean, they can always change their mind. but this is a clear signal that they feel strongly in favor of wheaten. i ve got to say i think there s a fact confusion in the
this and possibly flipping the majority on it, just on that comprehension point of exactly what are the complexities involved here? well, the fact that they issued this temporary injunction is also quite extraordinary. it s actually technically considered an extraordinary action by the court. which is another issue that the dissenters take issue with. they are only supposed to do this when the petitioner s rights here, when wheaten colleges rights are indisputably at issue, indisputably clear. they re already supposed to have an extremely strong case on the merits for a temporary injunction like this to be issued. so it is quite a signal here for them to say to us or say to the country that we think that there is a real issue here. i mean, they can always change their mind. but this is a clear signal that they feel strongly in favor of wheaten. i ve got to say i think there s a fact confusion in the majority which they will