On August 7, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California entered an order denying a multinational technology company’s motion for summary judgment on claims that the.
On Thursday, Judge Lucy H. Koh of the Northern District of California issued an order partially granting and partially denying Zoom Video Communication
Tech
your username
March 12, 2021
On Thursday, Judge Lucy H. Koh of the Northern District of California issued an order partially granting and partially denying Zoom Video Communication Inc.âs motion to dismiss the first amended complaint in the consolidated privacy lawsuit against it.
The opinion noted that the plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and putative classes of Zoom users, alleged that Zoom violated nine provisions of California law by â(1) sharing Plaintiffsâ personally identifiable information with third parties; (2) misstating Zoomâs security capabilities; and (3) failing to prevent security breaches known asâZoombombing.ââ
Zoom moved to dismiss all of the claims with prejudice, making two primary arguments. In particular, Zoom contended that Section 230 (c)(1) of the Communications Decency Act âbars Plaintiff(s)â claims to the extent the claims are based on âZoombombingââ and the court noted that Zoom grou
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
In
Wesch v. Yodlee, Inc., 20-cv-05991 (N.D. Cal.) individual consumer plaintiffs brought a putative class action against defendants Yodlee, Inc. and its parent company Envestnet, Inc. Yodlee provides software to financial institutions to facilitate online transactions. Plaintiffs accuse defendants of secretly collecting and retaining their user information without their consent, and selling that information to third parties. Plaintiffs asserted a raft of claims against defendants, alleging violation of the federal Stored Communications Act (“SCA”) and the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), as well as state law claims for invasion of privacy, unjust enrichment, willful deception, as well as violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), California’s Comprehensive Data Access and Fraud Act (“CDAFA”), and the California Anti-Phishing Act of 2005.