Page 1040 - Conclusions News Today

And that includes the founding of the major network. so it is too bad. >> he is talking about the history of television. nothing about the women. he has similarly defended bill oreilly and mike tyson. he has even tried to let himself off the hook his boasting about being able to sexually assault women. telling friends that might not be his voice on the tape. now there are some exceptions and you can draw your own conclusions about them. in the 90s he took out full place ads. the central park fiv...

To negative conclusions. >> sean: unbelievable. >> shows how disconnected they are to the not only the military but whats going on in this country. >> sean: like the time for honoring themselves in hollywood will soon come to an end. i think i saw that in gladiator. >> hold on, sean, in contrast, when the president decided not to go to the white house corresponds dinner it was a national tragedy. he was disrespecting the first amendment. oh, it was the end of the earth, the apocalypse was coming...

The republican memo lays out a series of factual conclusions. the democratic memo is heavily footnoted but the actual text of the memo, largely deals with analysis and editorial opinions. those very footnotes are likely what the white house is having to redact because some of them cite to specific sources and methods that we use to collect intelligence. very different memos, very different styles, but in both circumstances, republicans have been fighting for transparency. democrats voted against...

Really? why is that so hard? >> well, i thought a couple things were interesting. one, everyone jumped to the immediate conclusion of associating with a dictator as opposed to somebody who loves and respects the military ands to honor them for their service. its amazing. i thought of the people you played that clip with and maybe im wrong. i aboil guise if i am. i dont think a single one of them has ever served. funny whether you have a president who respects and honors law enforcement, first re...

To negative conclusions. >> sean: unbelievable. >> shows how disconnected they are to the not only the military but whats going on in this country. >> sean: like the time for honoring themselves in hollywood will soon come to an end. i think i saw that in gladiator. >> hold on, sean, in contrast, when the president decided not to go to the white house corresponds dinner it was a national tragedy. he was disrespecting the first amendment. oh, it was the end of the earth, the apocalypse was coming...

That is political suicide. its okay for an average citizen, and yes, a judge would tell a jury you cannot make any conclusions from someone taking the right not to testify. thats one thing to say in a criminal trial. its another thing when the president of the united states, who is being asked to carry out the laws of the country, and who has taken an oath to support and defend the constitution, does not tell the truth and does not come forward and testify and takes the fifth amendment. so i thi...

Mystery. was she really a member of the sla? did she really change her mind, or was she coerced? was she forced, brainwashed? and that debate continues to this day. that debate is aired out in, you know, very interesting way in this documentary. >> well, in a way that no one else can do because you know so much about this. without asking you which of those -- >> i wrote a book about this. american heiress. >> conclusions as to her role, dont miss it. the radical story of patty hearst, produced, ...

Wittis, legal analyst and retired fbi special agent bobby chacon. the intelligence department voted monday night to release the memo. the white house claims transparency but describe this dellemma for them effectively signing off on a memo thats going to undercut the presidents argument? >> well, so thats, frankly, my heart is not wrending in two over the dilemma. the white house cleared on the release of a memo that apparently contains material omissions. the fbi says such that render its concl...

Security clearance and within a right to disregard the fact. the president cant change the fbi background process but he can choose to disregard the fbis conclusions about whether somebody deserves security clearance and he has apparently chosen to do so with jared kushner. hes cleared him to see all manner of classified information up to and including the daily brief which is kind of amazing if you dont have a security clearance youre allowed to see the president presidents daily. put yourself ...

Full exchange had to do with a gag gift of vladimir putin-themed calendars. manu raju asked senator johnson whether it had all been a joke. he said, quote, its a real possibility. we asked senator johnson to come on the program but never heard back from his staff or any secret society. i asked democratic congressman jim himes about it. >> these are all faux scandals that are thrown out there for the sole purpose of causing some americans to say, golly, i wonder whether the fbi is on the up and u...