Page 439 - Conclusions News Today

Accept the governments conclusions on these important and disputed issues without further review by a neutrahelan third party. >> i mean, meaning were notng going to trust you. listen >> yeah, listen, that is the legacy of the last six years of the fbi that started with james comey and andy mccabe.s comey and andrew continued under christopher wray, the judiciary. many americans, tens of millions of americans no longer unust the fbi to have an honor system and that is going to be a problem for t...

Whatever they may file, they have already made that very clear. and so those should be the priority here that dearie will work through and those are going to be the most -- obviously he the most contentious things, they are the heart of whatever could a rise. >> and so elliott, put yourself in the shoes of one of the prosecutors working on the investigation. the order as of now says you cannot use these documents to go to a grand jury. you cannot use these documents to interview the next witness...

Appropriate to accept the conclusions on these important and disputed issues without further review by a neutral third party. so thats why shes imposing the special master. she wants that master to review all the 11,000 documents seized, including the 100 classified documents she rejected the dojs request that she temporarily stayed part of the of the order and immediately allowed them to use them in the criminal investigation. they told her this was a matter of national security. the united sta...

Ive never heard of many of the people in that subpoena, which is kind of odd. but the thing that stood out more than anything else is that every single one of donald trumps lawyers that was on the legal team investigating voter fraud and election fraud, they are named in that subpoena. >> well thats not surprising, those are individuals who might have been doing something illegal. but what conclusions can you draw from the scope and the status of this investigation based on what we have learned ...

Now exactly what the scope of his role would be is a very interesting question. i dont know the answer to that. i think the question would be does he review everything. does he review only highly classified information to confirm the classification. thats all going to be worked out with the court. >> on the other topic, mark meadows now complying with the subpoena for documents which had been supplied to the january 6th committee prior. significance of that cop ration and can you read in any way...

Made that case, i hear as a democrat the constant refrain of, indict donald trump, throw him in jail. donald trump needs to be in jail. yes, if theres an investigation that leads to a chargeable crime, a trial and conviction, that should happen. those of us who may be the only ones left standing for an impartial judicial system need to be very careful that we dont inadvertently repeat the travesty of the trump administration by doing anything other than standing up for impartial and good process...

Out. i think this is the justice department trying to defend themselves in the court of public opinion. we know, ultimately, they will -- everything will get tried many court. but in the meantime, you know, there are a lot of people -- specifically, the former presidents supporters -- who are wondering if there was an overreach of power, if the justice department was right to execute a search on a former president. and the more that they are able to reveal the severity of the alleged crimes or a...

Which might provide factual support for the conclusions reached. and that what trumps argument lacks quote, in substance, and legal support, it seeks to substitute with length, hyperbole, and the settling of scores and grievances. trumps team said they will appeal this ruling. apart from all the embarrassment of this, trumps legal team might actually face some consequences here. judging middlebrook seems open to imposing sanctions on trumps attorneys for filing that lawsuit in the first place. i...

Deplorable, i actually find myself saying that, actually, barr is asking the right questions. i think hes come to the correct conclusions. the special master decision was flawed. the opinion was wrong. it should be overruled. it will be overruled unless the courts decide to become even more politicized. the government can indict donald trump. they have a case to indict donald trump. then barr asks the question that certainly wont be popular among many watching this show, wont be popular among ma...

Police which we saw going back to al sharpton, echoed by eric holder in 2014 where it was the first instinct of theirs was to say its racial. if someone is arrested, its racial. if someone is manhandled, its racist. thats also i think compromised policing across the country because you talk to the police. they are afraid. they are afraid to do anything lest they be called racist for arresting someone whos not cooperative. its very difficult to be a police officer in this environment. >> its incr...