Page 704 - Conclusions News Today

Might not want to testify. its challenging for young kids. like the young lady that spoke a while ago, she feels responsible and she should not feel responsible. >> melissa: let me just ask, though -- in your opinion, does that mean to you that you need to see the details of the deal to decide whether alex acosta should step aside? or does that mean that, based on what you are seeing, you cant imagine a way that he could have signed off on this? whats the bottom line for you on this? i think of ...

Ago, i have no problem with bob mueller coming in and testifying about his investigation, his findings, and his conclusions. so barr is becoming about as consistent as donald trump. barr is also the person that in one breath says im going to recuse from an investigation and then turns around and says just kidding. im not going to recuse. he really is becoming less and less credible and reliable. you know, hes doing harm to the department and i think hes an embarrassment to the people that are wo...

Mueller upcoming testimony next week. one of muellers definitive conclusions at the beginning of the 450 page report was that the russians directly interfered in our 2016 presidential election. but in a briefing today up on capitol hill, top administration officials wouldnt even say whether president trump has even received a comprehensive briefing on election security looking forward to 2020. i know you were at a sensitive briefing on this issue today as well. does that worry you? >> no. that d...

Cooperate with yet a fifth investigation. private americans, they are legal fees, they are spiraling out of control, all because of an outright smear campaign from the democrats. they never accepted the election loss in 2016. they are not accepting now five separate conclusions, no collusion. that is government harassment. that is government abuse of power plain and simple. i would urge these people, youve already testified, you cant add to what you testified to before, you are only walking into...

Private americans, their legal fees, they are spiraling out of control, all because of an outright smear campaign from the democrats. they never accepted the election loss in 2016. they are not accepting now five separate conclusions, no collusion. that is government harassment. that is government abuse of power, plain and simple.t i would urge these people, youve already testified, you cant add to what you testified to before, you are only walking into a perjury trap. maybe the fifth amendment ...

It seems to me the only reason for doing that is to create some kind of public spectacle and if bob decides that he doesnt want to be subject to that, then the department of justice would certainly back him. >> its a lot ocho talk about and here for our lead off discussion on a monday night, jonathan lamarre, white house reporter for the associated press, maya wiley, former assistant u.s. attorney for the southern district of new york with the new school here in new york and katy justice departm...

Are we doing the right thing and not reading too much into that? >> well, i think if the u.s. attorney says dont read too much into it, its important not to jump to conclusions. we never should. certainly what is in the indictment does not have any public corruption in it, right? from what we know so far, it is a sex trafficking case. there could be other reasons why the public integrity unit might be the lawyers themselves. it might be how the staffing is going. there could be other reasons. i ...

Somehow. disappointed to see him subpoenaed because i dont think that serves any purpose dragging bob mueller up if he in fact is going to stick to the report. it seems to me the only reason for doing that is to create some kind of public spectacle and if bob decides that he doesnt want to be subject to that, then the department of justice would certainly back him. >> its a lot ocho talk about and here for our lead off discussion on a monday night, jonathan lamarre, white house reporter for the ...

Not those who would normally handle sex trafficking. are we doing the right thing and not reading too much into that? >> well, i think if the u.s. attorney says dont read too much into it, its important not to jump to conclusions. we never should. certainly what is in the indictment does not have any public corruption in it, right? from what we know so far, it is a sex trafficking case. there could be other reasons why the public integrity unit might be the lawyers themselves. it might be how th...

Somehow. disappointed to see him subpoenaed because i dont think that serves any purpose dragging bob mueller up if he in fact is going to stick to the report. it seems to me the only reason for doing that is to create some kind of public spectacle and if bob decides that he doesnt want to be subject to that, then the department of justice would certainly back him. >> its a lot ocho talk about and here for our lead off discussion on a monday night, jonathan lamarre, white house reporter for the ...